Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2024-08-29] iOS - Expense report jumps when returning from transaction thread #47656

Closed
1 of 6 tasks
IuliiaHerets opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 20 comments
Closed
1 of 6 tasks
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2

Comments

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link

IuliiaHerets commented Aug 19, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: v9.0.22-3
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
Issue was found when executing this PR: #47096
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): applausetester+kh050806@applause.expensifail.com
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to workspace chat.
  3. Submit three expenses with receipt.
  4. Tap on the expense preview to go to expense report.
  5. Tap on the first expense preview to go to transaction thread.
  6. Tap on the back button.

Expected Result:

The expense report will not jump when returning from transaction thread.

Actual Result:

The expense report jumps when returning from transaction thread.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6576348_1724092355663.ScreenRecording_08-20-2024_02-24-42_1.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @dylanexpensify
@IuliiaHerets IuliiaHerets added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Aug 19, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @arosiclair (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @dylanexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Daily KSv2 label Aug 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added Engineering Hourly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Aug 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link
Author

We think that this bug might be related to #wave-collect - Release 1

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

This is very minor issue, possibly from a PR #47096 @kirillzyusko and me worked on, i dont think this needs be a deployblocker we can work on it as a follow up.

@arosiclair
Copy link
Contributor

This is very minor issue, possibly from a PR #47096 @kirillzyusko and me worked on, i dont think this needs be a deployblocker we can work on it as a follow up.

Agreed this is super minor. Removing the label and assigning you @ishpaul777

@arosiclair arosiclair added Daily KSv2 and removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Engineering Hourly KSv2 labels Aug 20, 2024
@arosiclair
Copy link
Contributor

Also assigning @marcochavezf since you were managing the bug for #47096

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Aug 20, 2024

please assign @kirillzyusko as well also i think we are going to revert the PR #47669 so we might just close it if its resolved with revert

@dylanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 we need @kirillzyusko to comment here to do so, once done - we will assign

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ah.. got it 👍

@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

@IuliiaHerets @marcochavezf the revert is done, would you please test on staging and confirm it's fixed?

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link
Author

@neil-marcellini Issue was fixed, not repro already

ScreenRecording_08-21-2024.00-20-14_1.MP4

@kirillzyusko
Copy link
Contributor

we need @kirillzyusko to comment here to do so

Commenting to be assigned 👋

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Daily KSv2 labels Aug 22, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title iOS - Expense report jumps when returning from transaction thread [HOLD for payment 2024-08-29] iOS - Expense report jumps when returning from transaction thread Aug 22, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 22, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.23-0 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-08-29. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 22, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@ishpaul777] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@ishpaul777] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@ishpaul777] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@ishpaul777] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@ishpaul777] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@dylanexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

@dylanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Payment summary:

Contributor+: @ishpaul777 $250 via Upwork

Please apply/request!

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

@dylanexpensify No payment here i was not involved in the PR

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Aug 28, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

  • Contributor: @kirillzyusko is from an agency-contributor and not due payment
  • ROLE: @ishpaul777 paid $(AMOUNT) via Upwork (LINK)

BugZero Checklist (@dylanexpensify)

  • I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
  • I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
  • I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
  • I have verified the payment summary above is correct

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Aug 30, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 2, 2024

@marcochavezf, @kirillzyusko, @dylanexpensify, @ishpaul777 Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too...

@marcochavezf
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this one in favor of #44514

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants