[HOLD for payment 2024-12-05] [Workspace feeds] When accounting integration is connected, there's no default in the card export row. It should be "Default card"

[m-natarajan]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number:
Reproducible in staging?: Needs reproduction
Reproducible in production?: Needs reproduction
If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?:
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @joekaufmanexpensify
Slack conversation (hyperlinked to channel name): #quality

Action Performed:

Prerequisite:
Members and company cards added in workspace

1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
2. Choose the workspace from settings
3. Click company cards >Card Details

Expected Result:

When accounting integration is connected, there's default card in the card export row.

Actual Result:

When accounting integration is connected, there's no default card in the card export row.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Standalone
• Android: HybridApp
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Standalone
• iOS: HybridApp
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @twisterdotcom

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @twisterdotcom (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[m-natarajan]

BZ team member, Callstack will work on this issue, please wait for them to comment before moving the issue forward.

[MelvinBot]

This has been labelled "Needs Reproduction". Follow the steps here: https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/16989

[melvin-bot]

Current assignee @mountiny is eligible for the AutoAssignerNewDotQuality assigner, not assigning anyone new.

[mountiny]

added to the project

[narefyev91]

Hi, I'm Nicolay from Callstack - expert contributor group - and I would like to work on this issue.

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[DylanDylann]

The PR still be reviewing

[melvin-bot]

@twisterdotcom, @narefyev91, @mountiny, @DylanDylann Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.67-9 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [Internal QA]: Fix default card with export type #52575

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-12-05. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @narefyev91 does not require payment (Contractor)
• @DylanDylann requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)

[melvin-bot]

@DylanDylann @twisterdotcom @DylanDylann The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[mountiny]

@DylanDylann can you please add a checklist?

[DylanDylann]

BugZero Checklist:

• [Contributor] Classify the bug:

Bug classification

Source of bug:

• 1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
• 1b. Mistake during implementation
• 1c. Backend bug
• 1z. Other:

Where bug was reported:

• 2a. Reported on production
• 2b. Reported on staging (deploy blocker)
• 2c. Reported on both staging and production
• 2d. Reported on a PR
• 2z. Other:

Who reported the bug:

• 3a. Expensify user
• 3b. Expensify employee
• 3c. Contributor
• 3d. QA
• 3z. Other:

• [Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

  Link to comment: No because this seems like a case wasn't considered in document

• [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

  Link to discussion:

• [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

• [BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

  Link to issue:

Regression Test Proposal

Test:

1. Choose the workspace from settings
2. Click company cards >Card Details
3. Verify that default export account is presented in Export row - with name "Default card"
4. Click on menu item - Verify that "Default card" is pre-selected -> choose other export account
5. Verify that selected export account presented in menu item row

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

[melvin-bot]

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

• Contributor: @narefyev91 is from an agency-contributor and not due payment
• ROLE: @DylanDylann paid $250 via Upwork (https://www.upwork.com/nx/wm/offer/105224716)

BugZero Checklist (@twisterdotcom)

• I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
• I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
• I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
• I have verified the payment summary above is correct

[twisterdotcom]

Payment Summary:

• Contributor: @narefyev91 is from an agency-contributor and not due payment
• C+: @DylanDylann paid $250 via Upwork (https://www.upwork.com/nx/wm/offer/105224716)

[DylanDylann]

No need payment here, we will handle payment later

[twisterdotcom]

Cool, withdrew the one sent above.