Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2025-01-17] [$250] Web - QBO - Hint text for Vendor bill is not below the toggle #54436

Closed
1 of 8 tasks
vincdargento opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 26 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2

Comments

@vincdargento
Copy link

vincdargento commented Dec 20, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.76-12
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Yes
If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?: N/A
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): N/A
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team

Action Performed:

Precondition:

  • Workspace is connected to QBO.
  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to workspace settings > Accounting.
  3. Click Export.
  4. Click Export company card expenses as.
  5. Click Export as.
  6. Select Vendor bill.

Expected Result:

The hint text for Vendor bill is below the toggle (PR #43973) (this is also the same behavior in Advanced page).

Actual Result:

The hint text for Vendor bill is not below the toggle.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

  • Android: Standalone
  • Android: HybridApp
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Standalone
  • iOS: HybridApp
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

bug.mp4
bug

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021876342286796656020
  • Upwork Job ID: 1876342286796656020
  • Last Price Increase: 2025-01-06
Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @
Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @isabelastisser
@vincdargento vincdargento added Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Dec 20, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @isabelastisser (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@mkzie2
Copy link
Contributor

mkzie2 commented Dec 20, 2024

Edited by proposal-police: This proposal was edited at 2024-12-20 20:35:53 UTC.

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

The hint text for Vendor bill is not below the toggle.

What is the root cause of that problem?

We don't pass shouldPlaceSubtitleBelowSwitch to ToggleSettingOptionRow then the hint text is not displayed below the toggle. This happens after this PR where we missed this prop when implementing the offline pattern

{!shouldPlaceSubtitleBelowSwitch && subtitle && subTitleView}

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

Pass shouldPlaceSubtitleBelowSwitch here

We can check other places that use ToggleSettingOptionRow and pass the same prop if we want the hint text is also displayed below the toggle in this place.

What specific scenarios should we cover in automated tests to prevent reintroducing this issue in the future?

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

Reminder: Please use plain English, be brief and avoid jargon. Feel free to use images, charts or pseudo-code if necessary. Do not post large multi-line diffs or write walls of text. Do not create PRs unless you have been hired for this job.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Dec 23, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 24, 2024

@isabelastisser Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 26, 2024

@isabelastisser Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this?

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 30, 2024

@isabelastisser Now this issue is 8 days overdue. Are you sure this should be a Daily? Feel free to change it!

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 1, 2025

@isabelastisser 10 days overdue. Is anyone even seeing these? Hello?

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 3, 2025

@isabelastisser this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to a solution? Let's make sure we're treating this as a top priority. Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks!

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 3, 2025

@isabelastisser 12 days overdue. Walking. Toward. The. Light...

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

shubham1206agra commented Jan 6, 2025

Since I have creds to the QBO connection, it has not been updated for 2 weeks for some reason. Let me take over this issue as a reviewer.

@mkzie2's proposal looks good to me.

🎀👀🎀 C+ reviewed

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Triggered auto assignment to @Julesssss, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

@isabelastisser
Copy link
Contributor

I was OOO. Looking.

@isabelastisser isabelastisser added External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors labels Jan 6, 2025
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Web - QBO - Hint text for Vendor bill is not below the toggle [$250] Web - QBO - Hint text for Vendor bill is not below the toggle Jan 6, 2025
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021876342286796656020

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Current assignee @shubham1206agra is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.

@mkzie2
Copy link
Contributor

mkzie2 commented Jan 7, 2025

@shubham1206agra The PR is ready.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Jan 10, 2025
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$250] Web - QBO - Hint text for Vendor bill is not below the toggle [HOLD for payment 2025-01-17] [$250] Web - QBO - Hint text for Vendor bill is not below the toggle Jan 10, 2025
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Jan 10, 2025
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2025

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.82-12 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-01-17. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

  • @shubham1206agra requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)
  • @mkzie2 requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2025

@shubham1206agra @isabelastisser @shubham1206agra The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@isabelastisser
Copy link
Contributor

BugZero Checklist:

  • [Contributor] Classify the bug:
Bug classification

Source of bug:

  • 1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
  • 1b. Mistake during implementation
  • 1c. Backend bug
  • 1z. Other:

Where bug was reported:

  • 2a. Reported on production (eg. bug slipped through the normal regression and PR testing process on staging)
  • 2b. Reported on staging (eg. found during regression or PR testing)
  • 2d. Reported on a PR
  • 2z. Other:

Who reported the bug:

  • 3a. Expensify user
  • 3b. Expensify employee
  • 3c. Contributor
  • 3d. QA
  • 3z. Other:
  • [Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

    Link to comment:

  • [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

    Link to discussion:

  • [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

Regression Test Proposal Template
  • [BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

    Link to issue:

Regression Test Proposal

Precondition:

Test:

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

shubham1206agra commented Jan 15, 2025

BugZero Checklist:

  • [Contributor] Classify the bug:
Bug classification

Source of bug:

  • 1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
  • 1b. Mistake during implementation
  • 1c. Backend bug
  • 1z. Other:

Where bug was reported:

  • 2a. Reported on production (eg. bug slipped through the normal regression and PR testing process on staging)
  • 2b. Reported on staging (eg. found during regression or PR testing)
  • 2d. Reported on a PR
  • 2z. Other:

Who reported the bug:

  • 3a. Expensify user
  • 3b. Expensify employee
  • 3c. Contributor
  • 3d. QA
  • 3z. Other:
  • [Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

    Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/46511/files#r1917034726

  • [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

    Link to discussion: Not Required

  • [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

  • [BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

    Link to issue:

Regression Test Proposal

Precondition:

  • Workspace is connected to QBO.

Test:

  1. Go to App
  2. Go to workspace settings > Accounting.
  3. Click Export.
  4. Click Export company card expenses as.
  5. Click Export as.
  6. Select Vendor bill.
  7. Verify that the hint text for Vender bill displays below the toggle.

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@isabelastisser Can you send the offers here please?

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Jan 16, 2025
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

BugZero Checklist (@isabelastisser)

  • I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
  • I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants/1876342286796656020/hired)
  • I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
  • I have verified the payment summary above is correct

@isabelastisser
Copy link
Contributor

ROLE: @shubham1206agra paid $250 via Upwork link
ROLE: @mkzie2 pending payment in Upwork $250. Please share your Upwork profile, thanks.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Jan 20, 2025
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 21, 2025

@Julesssss, @isabelastisser, @shubham1206agra, @mkzie2 Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

@isabelastisser
Copy link
Contributor

@mkzie2, what's your Upwork profile?

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Jan 21, 2025
@mkzie2
Copy link
Contributor

mkzie2 commented Jan 22, 2025

@isabelastisser Hey, it's https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~019f73367b03c6d784

@isabelastisser
Copy link
Contributor

Payments are processed in Upwork. all set!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants