Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Workspace name label next to room name in the chats list #11799

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 26, 2022

Conversation

bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

@bernhardoj bernhardoj commented Oct 13, 2022

Details

Add Workspace name label next to room name in the chats list

Fixed Issues

$ #11543
PROPOSAL: #11543 (comment)

Tests

To test, you need to be at least in a workspace chat room.

  1. Open chat list page
  2. Verify every chat room named #admin or #announce
    a. is not truncated
    b. has a workspace name shown next to the chat room name
  3. Verify long workspace name is truncated in one line
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Review Checklist

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

QA Steps

To test, you need to be at least in a workspace chat room.

  1. Open chat list page
  2. Verify every chat room named #admin or #announce
    a. is not truncated
    b. has a workspace name shown next to the chat room name
  3. Verify long workspace name is truncated in one line
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Screenshots

Web

Compact Not Compact
web_compact web_not_compact

Mobile Web - Chrome

Compact Not Compact
android_moweb_compact android_moweb_not_compact

Mobile Web - Safari

Compact Not Compact
iphone_moweb_compact iphone_moweb_not_compact

Desktop

Compact Not Compact
desktop_compact desktop_not_compact

iOS

Compact Not Compact
iphone_compact iphone_not_compact

Android

Compact Not Compact
android_compact android_not_compact

@bernhardoj bernhardoj requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2022 13:44
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from mananjadhav and marcochavezf and removed request for a team October 13, 2022 13:45
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 13, 2022

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@shawnborton shawnborton self-requested a review October 13, 2022 15:41
@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

This is looking really good! Just a few design details:

  • The space between the room name and the pill should be just 4px
  • The horizontal padding inside of the pill should be 8px (it might be already, but just confirming)
  • The font size of the pill should be 11px, and we should already have a font size variable for this (micro? not sure what it's called)

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have updated the code and the screenshots

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

For this screenshot here:
image

I don't think we want the #announce room to truncate unless it was truly wider than the total available horizontal width of that row. Let me know if that makes sense.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mananjadhav mananjadhav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requested some smaller changes. @bernhardoj I would recommend add tests and screenshots for workspace name with ellipsis.

Also can we please add elaborate QA steps, this would involve, maybe identifying the #announce and #admin named chat?

src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ export default {
border: colors.gray2,
borderFocus: colors.blue,
icon: colors.gray3,
iconLight: 'rgba(198, 201, 202, 0.5)',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of doing this, we can stick to the existing colors.gray values and pass the style as opacity: 0.5

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we apply the opacity style to the text, it will affect the background color and the text itself. I was thinking that we could take the icon color and append the string with '80' (the hex will be #C6C9CA80), which is the hex code for the 50% opacity. So, it will look like this
StyleUtils.getBackgroundColorStyle(themeColors.icon + '80')
but I think it looks ugly, that's why I decided to add a new color.

If we still want to apply the opacity style, I think we need to change the TextPill component a bit by wrapping the text with View.

What do you think?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am fine with wrapping the View around Text.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, so it turns out that wrapping it with View and apply the opacity to the View also affects the Text. So, I think the only way is to apply the opacity to the backgroundColor.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I keep the iconLight color?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I know, RN does not have such thing, but we can make our own implementation. I am thinking that maybe we could make a new function in StyleUtils.js let say getBackgroundColorWithOpacityStyle which takes the hex code as string and the opacity as number (0 to 1). Then, we will convert that hex to rgb numbers then return rgba(r, g, b, opacity). It will look like this:

function getBackgroundColorWithOpacityStyle(background, opacity) {
    const r = ....
    const g = ....
    const b = .....
    return {
        backgroundColor: `rgba(${r}, ${g}, ${b}, ${opacity})`
    }
}

What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will lean on @mananjadhav and @marcochavezf to evaluate that, but I like the idea.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bernhardoj Can we not just use rgb(r, g, b, 0.5) in the colors.js ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we can remove the iconLight and use the new function above that I propose like this:
StyleUtils.getBackgroundColorWithOpacityStyle(themeColors.icon, 0.5).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My newest commit currently uses above approach. Let me know if there is any concern.

src/styles/styles.js Show resolved Hide resolved

const propTypes = {
/** Text to show */
children: PropTypes.string,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we rename this to something related to text say title? text. etc.?

children is generally used for nodes or React components and looks misleading here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

};

const defaultProps = {
children: '',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of setting this empty, we should make the property mandatory

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

For this screenshot here: image

I don't think we want the #announce room to truncate unless it was truly wider than the total available horizontal width of that row. Let me know if that makes sense.

Fixed. I also put some newest screenshots with long workspace name and updated the test steps.

{optionItem.isChatRoom && (
<TextPill
style={textPillStyle}
accessibilityLabel="Chat room name"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marcochavezf @shawnborton Can one of you confirm if this is the correct accessibilityLabel ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deferring to @marcochavezf as I am unfamiliar with this one.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah good question, since this only be used for Workspace name atm let's change the value to Workspace name

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

...whiteSpace.noWrap,
},

optionDisplayNameCompact: {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure I understand this change. Are we removing this style? This is used at two places (OptionRowLHN, and also OptionRow). I think removing this will break the styling in OptionRow.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I missed that it is also being used at OptionRow component. I merge both styles to fix the #announce text got truncated on not compact mode. I will fix it later. Thanks for pointing it out!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@bernhardoj Some more comments.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshots look pretty good to me! @bernhardoj could you also try pinning one of these rooms that has a super long name, in both compact and normal mode, and sharing screenshots please? Thanks!

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawnborton I have updated the screenshots.

shawnborton
shawnborton previously approved these changes Oct 19, 2022
@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome, screenshots look good to me! Thanks @bernhardoj

mananjadhav
mananjadhav previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@mananjadhav mananjadhav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes and being patient with this @bernhardoj.

🎀 👀 🎀 
C+ reviewed

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Oct 20, 2022

@marcochavezf @shawnborton Here's the checklist.

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

Web

web-worskspace-pill

Mobile Web - Chrome

mweb-android-worskspace-pill

Mobile Web - Safari

mweb-safari-worskspace-pill

Desktop

desktop-workspace-pill

iOS

ios-workspace-pill

Android

android-workspace-pill

Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf marcochavezf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you guys looks mostly good to me! Just a comment related to displayNameStyle

const displayNameStyle = StyleUtils.combineStyles(props.viewMode === CONST.OPTION_MODE.COMPACT
? [styles.optionDisplayName, ...textUnreadStyle, styles.optionDisplayNameCompact, styles.mr2]
: [styles.optionDisplayName, ...textUnreadStyle], props.style);
const displayNameStyle = StyleUtils.combineStyles([styles.optionDisplayName, styles.optionDisplayNameCompact, ...textUnreadStyle], props.style);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah why are we merging styles.optionDisplayName and styles.optionDisplayNameCompact here? Originally we were only appending styles.optionDisplayNameCompact if props.viewMode === CONST.OPTION_MODE.COMPACT

Copy link
Contributor Author

@bernhardoj bernhardoj Oct 22, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When the viewMode is Compact, we put the latest chat text next to DisplayName and we append the style.optionDisplayNameCompact to make sure DisplayName will take the whole available width. Now, we have TextPill next to DisplayName, that's why I append it no matter what the viewMode is. If we don't do this, the DisplayName will get truncated like @shawnborton previously mentioned here.

For this screenshot here: image

I don't think we want the #announce room to truncate unless it was truly wider than the total available horizontal width of that row. Let me know if that makes sense.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any update on this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh thanks for the explanation @bernhardoj, sorry for the delay here

@bernhardoj bernhardoj dismissed stale reviews from mananjadhav and shawnborton via 57b6006 October 26, 2022 07:14
Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf marcochavezf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you guys, LGTM

@marcochavezf
Copy link
Contributor

The PR checklists were already filled out, but the GH actions are failing because the text of one checkbox changed. So I'm going to merge it to unblock this change.

@marcochavezf marcochavezf merged commit e263ffa into Expensify:main Oct 26, 2022
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Oct 26, 2022
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 26, 2022

@marcochavezf looks like this was merged without the checklist test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@marcochavezf
Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf looks like this was merged without the checklist test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

#11799 (comment)

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @marcochavezf in version: 1.2.20-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by @chiragsalian in version: 1.2.20-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants