Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate AutoUpdateTime to functional component #16968

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath puneetlath commented Apr 5, 2023

Details

This PR makes the AutoUpdateTime class component into a functional component.

Fixed Issues

$ #16117

Tests

  1. Open the chat details pane in a chat with any user (e.g. http://localhost:8080/details?login=puneet%40expensify.com)
  2. Verify that the Local time field lists the local time with timezone and that it looks accurate
  3. Stay on that page for at least a minute
  4. Verify that the local time updates after a minute (e.g. 10:10 becomes 10:11)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

This component works the exact same offline as online, so can be tested the exact same way.

QA Steps

  1. Open the chat details pane in a chat with any user (e.g. staging.new.expensify.com/details?login=puneet%40expensify.com)
  2. Verify that the Local time field lists the local time with timezone and that it looks accurate
  3. Stay on that page for at least a minute
  4. Verify that the local time updates after a minute (e.g. 10:10 becomes 10:11)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web image
Mobile Web - Chrome Screenshot 2023-04-05 at 2 42 06 PM
Mobile Web - Safari Screenshot 2023-04-05 at 2 58 57 PM
Desktop image
iOS Screenshot 2023-04-05 at 4 53 30 PM
Android Screenshot 2023-04-05 at 2 53 16 PM

@puneetlath puneetlath self-assigned this Apr 5, 2023
@puneetlath puneetlath changed the title Auto update time hook Migrate AutoUpdateTime to functional component Apr 5, 2023
@puneetlath puneetlath marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2023 23:20
@puneetlath puneetlath requested a review from a team as a code owner April 5, 2023 23:20
@puneetlath puneetlath requested review from marcaaron and removed request for a team April 5, 2023 23:21
@MelvinBot
Copy link

@rushatgabhane @jasperhuangg One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@puneetlath puneetlath removed the request for review from rushatgabhane April 5, 2023 23:23
Copy link
Contributor

@marcaaron marcaaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty good to me! I left a few NABs. I'm not sure if any of the comments are really all that different from what you've got here.

src/components/AutoUpdateTime.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AutoUpdateTime.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AutoUpdateTime.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
return () => {
clearTimeout(timerRef.current);
};
}, [updateCurrentTime]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we want this code to be equivalent to what it was before we should maybe remove all the dependencies. Since updateCurrentTime() after every update before. Now it only runs when the reference for updateCurrentTime changes (i.e. useCallback() returns a new function because the currentUserLocalTime changed).

Putting it all together that would end up just looking like this:

useEffect(() => {
    if (timerRef.current) {
        clearTimeout(timerRef.current);
        timerRef.current = null;
    }
    const millisecondsUntilNextMinute = (60 - currentUserLocalTime.seconds()) * 1000;
    timerRef.current = setTimeout(() => {
        setCurrentUserLocalTime(getCurrentUserLocalTime());
    }, millisecondsUntilNextMinute);

    return () => {
        clearTimeout(timerRef.current);
    };
});

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That said, what you have here might work the same - but I didn't think too much about it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that this may be an equivalent of the previous class implementation, but I believe while creating functional component we should slightly change the mindset and instead of mapping class component's functionality into functional one we should try to re-write the same functionality from scratch using new tools.

Previously the above code was called on componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate lifecycle events - we should forget about lifecycle (not completely, just keep it in mind it exists and may have an impact on our code) and think when (on what prop/state change) this effect should be called.

So in the proposed code, I would add the dependency array - maybe empty one will be enough, maybe it should depend on some props changes (excluding currentUserLocalTime - please see my other comment). But leaving it without the deps array at all will cause it to be called on every single re-render which should be avoided.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I actually do think we want an infinite loop here. Because for as long as the user stays on this page, we want to keep updating the clock. So I think the behavior is correct where:

  1. Timer is set when component initially loads
  2. 1 min later, currentTime is updated
  3. This causes useEffect to be called and set another 1 min timer
  4. 1 min later, currentTime is updated
  5. repeat, every min

Can y'all double-check me that the function makes sense now?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's kind of strange actually now that I've looked at it and taking into consideration @burczu's notes. Maybe we should use a setInterval() instead to run the logic once per minute?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can see what @burczu thinks as well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok haha I see it now. Looks like it can work. Yeah I don't really have super strong feelings but think some kind of interval makes more sense than a timeout.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ach, you guys are right - using setInterval makes much more sense in this scenario! And i like the idea of extracting it into separate hook.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought about it more and while I think the separate hook works, I think I prefer the other method for two reasons:

  1. It updates the clock at the top of the minute, rather than every 60 seconds from when the component is loaded
  2. It's the most simple/straightforward

If y'all strongly disagree with that, let me know. Otherwise, this is ready for re-review!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tbh I'm fine with whatever. we kinda over-engineered it because the component is only used on the Details page. It's hard to imagine anyone is going to sit there for minutes at a time or that anyone will notice that the time is updated at the precise top of the minute.

src/components/AutoUpdateTime.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
return () => {
clearTimeout(timerRef.current);
};
}, [updateCurrentTime]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that this may be an equivalent of the previous class implementation, but I believe while creating functional component we should slightly change the mindset and instead of mapping class component's functionality into functional one we should try to re-write the same functionality from scratch using new tools.

Previously the above code was called on componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate lifecycle events - we should forget about lifecycle (not completely, just keep it in mind it exists and may have an impact on our code) and think when (on what prop/state change) this effect should be called.

So in the proposed code, I would add the dependency array - maybe empty one will be enough, maybe it should depend on some props changes (excluding currentUserLocalTime - please see my other comment). But leaving it without the deps array at all will cause it to be called on every single re-render which should be avoided.

@puneetlath puneetlath requested review from marcaaron and burczu April 6, 2023 14:06
marcaaron
marcaaron previously approved these changes Apr 7, 2023
jasperhuangg
jasperhuangg previously approved these changes Apr 7, 2023
@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor Author

@burczu over to you for the final review and checklist.

burczu
burczu previously approved these changes Apr 11, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@burczu burczu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm also approving it with one more minor comment. I'm working on the checklist now.

useEffect(() => {
// If the preferredLocale or timezone changes, we want to update the displayed time immediately
setCurrentUserLocalTime(getCurrentUserLocalTime());
}, [getCurrentUserLocalTime, props.preferredLocale, props.timezone.selected]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The getCurrentUserLocalTime method already depends on props.preferredLocale and props.timezone.selected so I think it's redundant here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I noticed that too. But the linter doesn't like it when I remove it 😅. Is there any downside to having that redundant dependency?
Screenshot 2023-04-11 at 7 42 25 AM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mean, you should remove props.preferredLocale and props.timezone.selected here, because it is already used as dependency in the getCurrentUserLocalTime. So this way:

const getCurrentUserLocalTime = useCallback(() => (
  DateUtils.getLocalMomentFromDatetime(
    props.preferredLocale,
    null,
    props.timezone.selected,
  )
), [props.preferredLocale, props.timezone.selected]);

...

useEffect(() => {
  // If the preferredLocale or timezone changes, we want to update the displayed time immediately
  setCurrentUserLocalTime(getCurrentUserLocalTime());
}, [getCurrentUserLocalTime]);

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah got it! That makes sense. Updated.

Copy link
Contributor

@burczu burczu Apr 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually... after the above change there is no sense to have two separate useEffect's cause they both have the same dependency array... so we can merge them into single one:

useEffect(() => {
  // If the preferredLocale or timezone changes, we want to update the displayed time immediately
  setCurrentUserLocalTime(getCurrentUserLocalTime());

  // If the user leaves this page open, we want to make sure the displayed time is updated every minute when the clock changes
  // To do this we create an interval to check if the minute has changed every second and update the displayed time if it has
  const interval = setInterval(() => {
    const currentMinute = new Date().getMinutes();
    if (currentMinute !== minuteRef.current) {
      setCurrentUserLocalTime(getCurrentUserLocalTime());
      minuteRef.current = currentMinute;
    }
  }, 1000);
  return () => clearInterval(interval);
}, [getCurrentUserLocalTime]);

That would be the last change request from me :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yeah, great point! Thanks a lot. Updated.

@burczu
Copy link
Contributor

burczu commented Apr 11, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
auto-update-time-web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
auto-update-time-web-mobile-chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
auto-update-time-web-mobile-safari.mp4
Desktop
auto-update-time-desktop.mp4
iOS
auto-update-time-ios.mp4
Android
auto-update-time-android.mp4

@puneetlath puneetlath dismissed stale reviews from burczu, jasperhuangg, and marcaaron via c3fdb16 April 11, 2023 12:49
@puneetlath puneetlath requested review from marcaaron and burczu April 11, 2023 12:50
@marcaaron marcaaron merged commit 99292fc into main Apr 11, 2023
@marcaaron marcaaron deleted the AutoUpdateTimeHook branch April 11, 2023 15:41
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.2.99-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.2.99-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants