Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update CONTRIBUTING.md #1715
Update CONTRIBUTING.md #1715
Changes from all commits
b922b6d
9c12f32
dfd836d
6e701b6
3795e64
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should still clarify that GH issues shouldn't be created for the sole purpose of asking questions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm I don't agree because I think we start opening the path to listing all ways to not ask a question if we do this type of approach. Right now I think it's really clear how/when to ask questions, and if we see someone violate that rule we just treat it like our manifesto (point them to the Contributing.md or Readme.md files, and ask them to re-read it).
I feel like listing it out is too exhaustive and specific - like we wouldn't want to get caught up saying "don't ask questions by... making new GH issues, messaging us in Upwork, emailing contributors@expensify.com, posting on the community, reaching out to concierge, etc"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we try out this suggestion, and circle back to update this copy if it's still generating issues to make the update you are proposing? I'm really hoping to keep brevity here so people actually read this guide 🤞 (but hey, time will tell if these edits actually help lol)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that works! We originally included it there since it is common for GH issues to be used to ask questions in open-source repositories, but I agree we can always re-add it if it actually becomes a problem
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This argument is the first one I'll remember if contributors continue to do this in the future (I've never been an external contributor of another project so I didn't know this!). Let me know if our contributors keep doing this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably fine to take out, but I agree that we don't want people creating GH issues to ask questions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We lost the emphasis here. This step gets missed a lot 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think these are still important to highlight, including the CLA link. Is there a reason we removed this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oversight on my part - as I thought we captured the part that was important, and didn't deem CLA stuff as fitting the bill. Apologies 😄, fixing now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Coming from https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C011W8BJ9L6/p1615481353152800?thread_ts=1615345614.094600&cid=C011W8BJ9L6, let's keep this section here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As mentioned in Slack, I'd like to see this stuff back in here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, adding back