Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: solve missing avatar workspace logo issue #21657

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 3, 2023

Conversation

developerdavi
Copy link
Contributor

@developerdavi developerdavi commented Jun 27, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #19905
PROPOSAL: #19905 (comment)

Tests

  1. Create a workspace
  2. Invite a user
    2.1. If you don't have a chat with the user, start one
  3. Verify that the workspace logo icon appears correctly in the combined user avatar
  4. Change the workspace logo to a valid image
  5. Verify that the workspace logo icon appears correctly in the combined user avatar
  6. The workspace icon should be consistent regardless of being a valid image or just the fallback icon, with same sizes, border and both be visibles

image
image
image

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

None. The changes do not affect offline behavior.

QA Steps

Same as Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

image

Mobile Web - Chrome

image
image
image

Mobile Web - Safari

image
image

Desktop
iOS

image
image

Android

image
image

@developerdavi developerdavi requested a review from a team as a code owner June 27, 2023 01:29
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from rushatgabhane and removed request for a team June 27, 2023 01:29
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 27, 2023

@rushatgabhane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 27, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@developerdavi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Jun 29, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web image image
Mobile Web - Chrome image
Mobile Web - Safari image
Desktop image
iOS image
Android image

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@developerdavi there is a border box for custom avatars. And it doesn't look nice. Could we do something about it?

image

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

Note that we require all contributors to upload screenshot for all platforms. Please make sure to do that when you get the time, thanks!

@developerdavi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@developerdavi there is a border box for custom avatars. And it doesn't look nice. Could we do something about it?

image

In which platform did that happen?

Note that we require all contributors to upload screenshot for all platforms. Please make sure to do that when you get the time, thanks!

The builds for iOS/Android do not have the workspace logo in the avatar, that's why I didn't include them, but I can provide.

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Jun 29, 2023

In which platform did that happen?

it's on web and happens on uploading any jpg

The builds for iOS/Android do not have the workspace logo in the avatar, that's why I didn't include them, but I can provide.

makes sense! but we still require it 😅
i know it seems unnecessary but just in case something weird happens. it has saved us many times and reduced the number of regressions vs when we didn't have this requirement

@developerdavi
Copy link
Contributor Author

developerdavi commented Jul 2, 2023

@rushatgabhane fixed border issue + updated PR with other platforms screenshots.

Ps.: I could not run desktop (electron) by my side, could you help me or run by yours?

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from NikkiWines July 3, 2023 04:50
@developerdavi
Copy link
Contributor Author

thank you @rushatgabhane 🙌

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@NikkiWines all yours!

Copy link
Contributor

@NikkiWines NikkiWines left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, couple of minor comments and you need to run npm run prettier

src/components/Avatar.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/styles/styles.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@developerdavi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NikkiWines applied all recommendations.

@developerdavi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ps.: maybe should be good to have prepush or precommit hooks to automatically run npm run prettier

Copy link
Contributor

@NikkiWines NikkiWines left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@NikkiWines NikkiWines merged commit e7a17f8 into Expensify:main Jul 3, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Jul 3, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 3, 2023

@NikkiWines looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 3, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

?? All tests were passing 🤨

Untitled.mov

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Jul 3, 2023

@NikkiWines yeah it's happening on all PRs. It's a bug with the bot

cc @mountiny

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 5, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/NikkiWines in version: 1.3.37-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 7, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.3.37-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Just noticed there is a regression from this PR #22467 (comment)


const iconStyle = props.imageStyles ? [StyleUtils.getAvatarStyle(props.size), styles.bgTransparent, ...props.imageStyles] : undefined;
const iconStyle = props.imageStyles && props.imageStyles.length ? [StyleUtils.getAvatarStyle(props.size), styles.bgTransparent, ...props.imageStyles] : undefined;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, Avatar component used to apply this style by default to all View at line 107 but and similarly the imageStyles was applied to image at line 110. We migrated imageStyle properly but not the wrapper View style. Now, iconStyle will be undefined by default causing issues. as mentioned above.

Is there any issues if I revert the iconStyle to be same as before.

@rushatgabhane

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am waiting on this question to move forward on a PR. Looking forward to it. @rushatgabhane @developerdavi

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@parasharrajat feel free to revert. it should be fine

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants