Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Parent Message of thread chat on LHN doesn't updated when the parent message is updated #23777
Parent Message of thread chat on LHN doesn't updated when the parent message is updated #23777
Changes from 5 commits
71fd420
d53c115
258743a
95b694f
59635b0
eeb8927
a369e76
9b70ac7
cd5ea63
a0df9fe
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is kind of unnecessary. Please revert this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I late realized it. Sorry.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dukenv0307 Bump.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@parasharrajat We use parentntReportAction in dependency (line 90)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should not put parentReportActions (all report actions) into dependency, we only should listen a parent report of that thread
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not saying to put the whole
parentReportActions
into dependency but to remove useMemo and directly get the parent action from the object asThere is nothing being calculated from
useMemo
its use is unnecessary.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@parasharrajat Sorry about that 😄 , I Just updated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have
withOnyx
HOC already we why we are adding another one?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ops, I didn't notice. May be it came during merging main. Will fix this in a followup in not done already.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@s77rt The second withOnyx is needed since the fullReport is only available after we successfully retrieve the data from Onyx with the previous withOnyx HOC
Please let me know if any concerns
cc @parasharrajat
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ohhh, so dependent keys... @hannojg was talking about this earlier. Not sure what is the status..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will make the option row re-render whenever any report action change (and not just the parent report action). This can be fixed in two ways:
prevProps.parentReportActions
withnextProps.parentReportActions
(which will be different if any report action chane), we should instead compareprevProps.parentReportActions[fullReport.parentReportActionID]
withnextProps.parentReportActions[fullReport.parentReportActionID]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thought was that because we are already listening to a particular collection and when any item in that collection changes it will update.
Here
I couldn't think of any other optimization during PR review so moved as it is. The memo idea is good. @dukenv0307 Do you want to create a followup?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@parasharrajat The PR to implement the memo custom comparator is ready for review: #24351
cc @s77rt