Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Copy email with text when IOU settled message is copied #26151

Merged

Conversation

huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 commented Aug 29, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #25567
PROPOSAL: #25567 (comment)

Tests

  1. From User A, request money from User B.
  2. From User B settle the money request report
  3. On the settled money request message, right-click (on the web) or long press (on mobile) and copy to the clipboard.
  4. Now paste this text and verify it contains User A's name or email.
  5. (Web Only) On the same settled money request message, hover over the message, click the copy icon from the mini context menu, and validate step 4.
  6. In the LHN, validate that the report's last message does not contain User A's name/email.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

We need to have settled a Money request report online.

  1. On the settled money request message, right-click (on the web) or long press (on mobile) and copy to the clipboard.
  2. Now paste this text and verify it contains User A's name or email.
  3. (Web Only) On the same settled money request message, hover over the message, click the copy icon from the mini context menu, and validate step 4.
  4. In the LHN, validate that the report's last message does not contain User A's name/email.

QA Steps

Same as "Tests" section above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Chrome

Web.Chrome.mp4

Safari

Web.Safari.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
mWeb.Chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
mWeb.Safari.mp4
Desktop
Desktop.Native.mp4
iOS
IOS.Native.mp4
Android
Android.Native.mp4

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2023 07:52
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team August 29, 2023 07:52
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2023

@Ollyws Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ollyws I noticed that we show name/email with the "Owns" message in LHN

Owns message

I think for consistency we should match behaviour for "Owns" and "Paid" message in LHN, i.e either show name/email for both in LHN or hide or both in LHN. Thoughts?

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Aug 29, 2023

@huzaifa-99 Yes I'm inclined to agree, that is inconsistent. I've asked in Slack.

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Aug 29, 2023

@Beamanator What do you think about this comment? I've asked on slack but no replies.
Was there a particular reason we are not adding the name in the paid $... elsewhere message as we do with other messages?

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

Was there a particular reason we are not adding the name in the paid $... elsewhere message as we do with other messages?

@Ollyws, just to be clear you mean for the LHN right and not for the report message?

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Aug 29, 2023

Yeah in the LHN

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ollyws I saw some discussion on Slack suggestion fixing the other texts/msgs for IOU reports in LHN. I don't know the full list of msgs/texts there but will investigate today and update here.

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

huzaifa-99 commented Sep 5, 2023

Discussion is still ongoing. I left a message in slack here.

Edit: Internal engineers are busy with the new feature launch. Will ping them again in a day or 2.

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have bumped the message in slack, will wait for the team's response.

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bumped the convo again in slack.

cc: @Ollyws

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

From the slack convo, we seem to align on showing the username in LHN for paid messages and for other messages (which we are already doing). I have updated the PR to show the payer name for paid IOU/Expense messages in LHN.

cc: @Ollyws

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

huzaifa-99 commented Sep 13, 2023

Updated test videos. This is ready for review again.

@@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ type WaitingOnBankAccountParams = {submitterDisplayName: string};

type SettledAfterAddedBankAccountParams = {submitterDisplayName: string; amount: string};

type PaidElsewhereWithAmountParams = {amount: string};
type PaidElsewhereWithAmountParams = {payer: string; amount: number};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have we set this type as number while all the others are string?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@huzaifa-99 huzaifa-99 Sep 13, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Ollyws My bad, fixed ef07817

paidWithExpensifyWithAmount: ({amount}: PaidWithExpensifyWithAmountParams) => `paid ${amount} with Expensify`,
paidElsewhereWithAmount: ({payer, amount}: PaidElsewhereWithAmountParams) => `${payer} paid ${amount} elsewhere`,
paidUsingPaypalWithAmount: ({payer, amount}: PaidUsingPaypalWithAmountParams) => `${payer} paid ${amount} using Paypal.me`,
paidWithExpensifyWithAmount: ({payer, amount}: PaidWithExpensifyWithAmountParams) => `${payer} paid ${amount} using Expensify`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wondering why we're changing this from with to using, was that something from the slack discussion?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

paidElsewhereWithAmount and paidUsingPaypalWithAmount are the same as main. paidUsingExpensifyWithAmount was changed to paidWithExpensifyWithAmount in #27006.

@Ollyws

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Sep 14, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
MacOS_Chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
Android_Chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
iOS_Safari.mp4
Desktop
MacOS_Desktop.mp4
iOS
iOS_Native.mp4
Android
Android_Native.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@Ollyws Ollyws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for all your effort here @huzaifa-99!
LGTM.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from Beamanator September 14, 2023 17:51
@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks so much for your efforts @Ollyws and @huzaifa-99 ! 🙏

So sorry for the delay, but I should be back and ready to help push this forward :D

@huzaifa-99 again sorry for my delay, it looks like there's conflicts now 🙃

@huzaifa-99
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks so much for your efforts @Ollyws and @huzaifa-99 ! 🙏
@huzaifa-99 again sorry for my delay, it looks like there's conflicts now 🙃

@Beamanator Thank you and no worries 😊. I fixed the merge conflicts.

Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Beamanator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Beamanator Beamanator merged commit 9fd7d46 into Expensify:main Sep 20, 2023
11 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.72-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.3.72-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants