Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Load parent report action from withOnyx in ReportScreen #33970

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen commented Jan 4, 2024

Details

This PR removes the deprecated method ReportActionsUtils.getParentReportAction(report); and changes the ReportScreen component to properly load the parent report action using withOnyx.

Fixed Issues

Part of #27262

Tests

  1. Click on global create
  2. Select Request Money
  3. Enter a manual amount (any request type is fine)
  4. Select a user
  5. Save the request
  6. You will be taken to the report with the request preview
  7. Click on the preview
  8. Click on the request to view the details
  9. In the header of the report, click on the three-dot menu and delete the request. You know that the parent report action was loaded properly if the delete button is visible.
  10. Verify the request is deleted successfully
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Same as above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome Unable to test due to emulator not working locally
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

image

Android: mWeb Chrome

Unable to test due to emulator not working locally

iOS: Native

image

iOS: mWeb Safari

image

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

image

MacOS: Desktop

image

@tgolen tgolen self-assigned this Jan 4, 2024
@tgolen tgolen requested a review from a team as a code owner January 4, 2024 18:02
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from roryabraham and removed request for a team January 4, 2024 18:02
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 4, 2024

@roryabraham Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

/** Array of report actions for this report */
reportActions: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.shape(reportActionPropTypes)),
/** All the report actions for this report */
reportActions: PropTypes.objectOf(PropTypes.shape(reportActionPropTypes)),
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tgolen tgolen Jan 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed this was set to an array, but I checked the data in Onyx (it's an object) and the place that uses this data also has it typed in TS as a Record (which would be an object and not an array).

{
// This is added down here so that it can access the full report object fetched from Onyx in the previous withOnyx.
parentReportActions: {
key: ({report}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${report ? report.parentReportID : 0}`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a case when parentReportID is empty string?
If not, that's fine but if possible, recommend report && report.parentReportID || 0}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It shouldn't be possible, no. I checked all of the other places where the parent report actions are fetched using withOnyx and they all use the ternary. It's a little inconsistent whether the ternary returns 0 or the string '0', but since it's a template string that will always cast it all to a string anyway, I guess it doesn't really matter.

@@ -239,7 +238,6 @@ function ReportScreen({
policy={policy}
personalDetails={personalDetails}
isSingleTransactionView={isSingleTransactionView}
parentReportAction={parentReportAction}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Turns out this component no longer references a parentReportAction prop, so I just removed it. The parentReportAction is only used in the MoneyRequestHeader.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! Just in case you were curious, I checked and this type of error would not be possible with TypeScript, so that's good 🙂

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Jan 5, 2024

@aimane-chnaif bump for review/testing please.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

aimane-chnaif commented Jan 5, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
msafari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe unrelated but noticed very buggy behavior on iOS

ios.mov
  • after request, report preview doesn't show immediately (00:22-00:26)
  • subtitle in header (for parent navigation) disappears in transaction detail page (00:37-00:39)
  • transaction detail page auto-closes without any user interaction (00:42-00:45)
  • "Delete request" option doesn't show in 3 dots menu of header (01:10-01:18)

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Jan 5, 2024

Strange... I don't know what to say except... I can't reproduce any of that. Could you try debugging parentReportAction and see if it's able to find it and if it's passing it properly to MoneyRequestHeader?

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Also reproduced on main, not caused by this PR so out of scope

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from youssef-lr January 5, 2024 22:41
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 5, 2024

@youssef-lr Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 5, 2024

🎯 @aimane-chnaif, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #34071.

Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Delete request" option doesn't show in 3 dots menu of header

@tgolen Upon testing against main vs this branch, this is clearly reproducible and caused by this PR. Confirmed not happening on main

In this video, former part is from this branch, latter part is from main

Screen.Recording.2024-01-06.at.2.08.04.AM.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm having trouble with my dev environment and it's making it difficult to validate this solution, but I made some tweaks that I think would improve this in two ways:

  1. No need to double-wrap this component in withOnyx and make a deeper component tree
  2. Don't re-render ReportScreen when any reportAction on the parent report is added or updated, only the one we care about – the one with parentReportActionID
diff --git a/src/pages/home/ReportScreen.js b/src/pages/home/ReportScreen.js
index 416a8b5f13..f9a1f1c746 100644
--- a/src/pages/home/ReportScreen.js
+++ b/src/pages/home/ReportScreen.js
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ const propTypes = {
     /** All the report actions for this report */
     reportActions: PropTypes.objectOf(PropTypes.shape(reportActionPropTypes)),
 
-    /** All the report action belonging the report's parent */
-    parentReportActions: PropTypes.objectOf(PropTypes.shape(reportActionPropTypes)),
+    /** The report's parentReportAction */
+    parentReportAction: reportActionPropTypes,
 
     /** Whether the composer is full size */
     isComposerFullSize: PropTypes.bool,
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ const propTypes = {
 const defaultProps = {
     isSidebarLoaded: false,
     reportActions: {},
-    parentReportActions: {},
+    parentReportAction: {},
     report: {},
     reportMetadata: {
         isLoadingInitialReportActions: true,
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ function ReportScreen({
     report,
     reportMetadata,
     reportActions,
-    parentReportActions,
+    parentReportAction,
     accountManagerReportID,
     personalDetails,
     markReadyForHydration,
@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ function ReportScreen({
     const isOptimisticDelete = lodashGet(report, 'statusNum') === CONST.REPORT.STATUS.CLOSED;
     const shouldHideReport = !ReportUtils.canAccessReport(report, policies, betas);
     const isLoading = !reportID || !isSidebarLoaded || _.isEmpty(personalDetails);
-    const parentReportAction = parentReportActions[report.parentReportActionID];
     const isSingleTransactionView = ReportUtils.isMoneyRequest(report);
     const policy = policies[`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY}${report.policyID}`] || {};
     const isTopMostReportId = currentReportID === getReportID(route);
@@ -578,14 +577,16 @@ export default compose(
                 key: ({route}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_USER_IS_LEAVING_ROOM}${getReportID(route)}`,
                 initialValue: false,
             },
-        },
-        true,
-    ),
-    withOnyx(
-        {
-            // This is added down here so that it can access the full report object fetched from Onyx in the previous withOnyx.
-            parentReportActions: {
+            parentReportAction: {
                 key: ({report}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${report ? report.parentReportID : 0}`,
+                selector: (parentReportActions, props) => {
+                    const parentReportActionID = lodashGet(props, 'report.parentReportActionID');
+                    if (!parentReportActionID) {
+                        return {};
+                    }
+                    return parentReportActions[parentReportActionID];
+                },
                 canEvict: false,
             },
         },

I think this should work as expected and be better for performance. @tgolen what do you think?

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor

+1 @roryabraham, your changes are working for me. I like that we'll only grab the report action we care about.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Jan 8, 2024

@roryabraham Every time I've tried to get this to work with a selector, I've found that the props are not passed to the selector properly. Your changes should work in theory, but in practice, they don't to my knowledge. If you can actually test that to verify it works, let me know and I will switch to it.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Jan 8, 2024

@aimane-chnaif Thanks for further videos and I understand that you're able to reproduce it. I was hoping that since you could reproduce it, you could help debug it to figure out why it's not able to find the parent report action. It doesn't look like you did that debugging. I'll take another look at this today in hopes that I might be able to reproduce it and complete the debugging.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Jan 8, 2024

@roryabraham @youssef-lr you're right, it did work! That's great that this is working with the selector. I'll push those changes up now.

@aimane-chnaif I was still never able to reproduce the missing "Delete" option from the three-dot menu. Could you please try again with the latest change?

@tgolen tgolen requested a review from roryabraham January 8, 2024 17:06
@tgolen tgolen requested a review from aimane-chnaif January 8, 2024 17:06
roryabraham
roryabraham previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! great news that the selector worked as expected, and sorry I wasn't able to provide better testing support.

@@ -239,7 +238,6 @@ function ReportScreen({
policy={policy}
personalDetails={personalDetails}
isSingleTransactionView={isSingleTransactionView}
parentReportAction={parentReportAction}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! Just in case you were curious, I checked and this type of error would not be possible with TypeScript, so that's good 🙂

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

holing off on merging to let @aimane-chnaif answer @tgolen's questions and re-test after the selector change.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

retesting

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Jan 8, 2024

@roryabraham I tried using the selector in another PR and it didn't work again. I think I may have stumbled upon the bug...

The props that are passed to the selector looks like they only contain props that are loaded from Onyx and they are not the full props from the component. This rings a bell from when I implemented this: https://github.com/Expensify/react-native-onyx/blob/main/lib/withOnyx.js#L34

There could maybe be a solution where the selector has a third argument that includes the props that were originally passed to the component and were not loaded from Onyx in that instance of the HOC.

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

That makes sense to me, good sleuthing. I'd be happy to review a PR for that feature in Onyx.

Also, thinking more long-term, using passed-in props (or values from Onyx, for that matter) in a selector would be trivial if we had a hook-based Onyx API, because those values would already be in-scope:

function MyComponent({reportID, parentReportActionID}) {
    const report = useOnyx(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}reportID`);
    const parentReportAction = useOnyx(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${report.parentReportID}`, {
        // note: at this point we could use any property from `report` or from passed-in props
        selector: (reportActions) => reportActions[parentReportActionID]
    });
    ...
    ...
}

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

Actually @tgolen, maybe instead of using a 3rd param for the selector, we should do what we do for the key config and merge passed-in props together with data from Onyx

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Jan 8, 2024

Unfortunately, the selectors are a bit deeper down here: https://github.com/Expensify/react-native-onyx/blob/34e293766dc7f7fa7e5bf23a2aab5c95c563610f/lib/Onyx.js#L113 and it would take quite a bit of work to get the props down at that level, possibly. I haven't really tried.

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor

Heads up @tgolen, there are conflicts now.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Jan 9, 2024

Conflicts are solved. Looks like this is waiting on @aimane-chnaif performing some final tests and @youssef-lr or @roryabraham approving/merging.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

will give 🟢 in an hour

Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from thienlnam January 9, 2024 21:46
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2024

@thienlnam Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@youssef-lr youssef-lr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! All yours @roryabraham

@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit 8a559fd into main Jan 10, 2024
19 checks passed
@roryabraham roryabraham deleted the tgolen-refactor-reportscreensideloading branch January 10, 2024 23:50
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.4.24-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.24-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants