Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD Expensify/issues/390731] Fix account menu item visibility + reset account values #41079

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

@narefyev91 narefyev91 commented Apr 26, 2024

Details

The Vendor row should only show if the admin enables the Default vendor toggle.
The Account row should only be visible when user selects card type

Fixed Issues

$ #41032
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Connect to QBO
  2. Go to Export > Export company cards as page
  3. Choose Vendor bill for export
  4. Verify that Accounts payable menu item is now shown
  5. Verify that Default vendor toggle row is now shown, but the toggle is disabled
  6. Enable the Default vendor toggle
  7. Verify the Vendor menu item is now shown
  8. Disable the Default vendor toggle
  9. Verify the Vendor menu item is now not shown
  10. Change the export type to Credit card
  11. Verify Accounts payable is not shown
  12. Verify Account is shown
  13. Choose an account in the list
  14. Change the export type to Debit card
  15. Verify the value in the Account field is cleared
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Connect to QBO
  2. Go to Export > Export company cards as page
  3. Choose Vendor bill for export
  4. Verify that Accounts payable menu item is now shown
  5. Verify that Default vendor toggle row is now shown, but the toggle is disabled
  6. Enable the Default vendor toggle
  7. Verify the Vendor menu item is now shown
  8. Disable the Default vendor toggle
  9. Verify the Vendor menu item is now not shown
  10. Change the export type to Credit card
  11. Verify Accounts payable is not shown
  12. Verify Account is shown
  13. Choose an account in the list
  14. Change the export type to Debit card
  15. Verify the value in the Account field is cleared

QA Steps

  1. Connect to QBO
  2. Go to Export > Export company cards as page
  3. Choose Vendor bill for export
  4. Verify that Accounts payable menu item is now shown
  5. Verify that Default vendor toggle row is now shown, but the toggle is disabled
  6. Enable the Default vendor toggle
  7. Verify the Vendor menu item is now shown
  8. Disable the Default vendor toggle
  9. Verify the Vendor menu item is now not shown
  10. Change the export type to Credit card
  11. Verify Accounts payable is not shown
  12. Verify Account is shown
  13. Choose an account in the list
  14. Change the export type to Debit card
  15. Verify the value in the Account field is cleared
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web1.mov
Screen.Recording.2024-04-26.at.11.41.43.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@narefyev91 narefyev91 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 26, 2024 10:29
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from s77rt and removed request for a team April 26, 2024 10:29
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 26, 2024

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

This comment has been minimized.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Connect to QBO
Go to Export > Export company cards as
Choose Vendor bill for export
Verify that Vendor bill menu item is shown

For these QA steps aren't they more accurately:

Connect to QBO
Go to Export > Export company cards as
Choose Vendor bill for export
Verify that Vendor bill Accounts payable menu item is shown
Verify that Default vendor toggle row is shown, but disabled
Enable "Default vendor"
Verify the Vendor menu item is shown

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Connect to QBO
Go to Export > Export company cards as
Choose Vendor bill for export
Verify that Vendor bill menu item is shown

For these QA steps aren't they more accurately:

Connect to QBO
Go to Export > Export company cards as
Choose Vendor bill for export
Verify that Vendor bill Accounts payable menu item is shown
Verify that Default vendor toggle row is shown, but disabled
Enable "Default vendor"
Verify the Vendor menu item is shown

I think that it should not be shown? Github issue is saying "The Vendor row should only show if the admin enables the Default vendor toggle."

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

I think that it should not be shown? Github issue is saying "The Vendor row should only show if the admin enables the Default vendor toggle."

Correct, yeah! Happy to make the steps clearer and more expansive:

  1. Connect to QBO
  2. Go to Export > Export company cards as page
  3. Choose Vendor bill for export
  4. Verify that Accounts payable menu item is now shown
  5. Verify that Default vendor toggle row is now shown, but the toggle is disabled
  6. Enable the Default vendor toggle
  7. Verify the Vendor menu item is now shown
  8. Disable the Default vendor toggle
  9. Verify the Vendor menu item is now not shown
  10. Change the export type to Credit card
  11. Verify Accounts payable is not shown
  12. Verify Account is shown
  13. Choose an account in the list
  14. Change the export type to Debit card
  15. Verify the value in the Account field is cleared

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Okay, results from testing this PR:

2024-04-26_13-32-54.mp4
  1. Account is shown despite no export type being selected (i.e Credit card || Debit card
  2. Vendor menu item is shown despite the Default vendor toggle being disabled
  3. Still no values available for Accounts payable in the list (we need to figure that out somewhere)
  4. We're hitting a bunch of errors when the fields are left blank, but I think that might be because of the lack of defaults I created an issue for here.

Example response from the Network tab:

{
    "jsonCode": 0,
    "message": "PolicyAPI::updatePolicyConnectionConfiguration(): Argument #5 ($settingValue) must be of type string, null given, called in \/git\/releases\/expensify.com\/55c9fbc\/api.php on line 2159",
    "requestID": "87a6a4ec88454164-LHR",
    "onyxData": []
}

Log line as well:

[OOPS!] API threw TypeError - 4ea25fa7eede973d2ab4f5cb3bc3aac9 ~~ exceptionMessage: 'PolicyAPI::updatePolicyConnectionConfiguration(): Argument #5 ($settingValue) must be of type string, null given, called in /git/releases/expensify.com/55c9fbc/api.php on line 2159' exceptionFile: '/git/releases/expensify.com/55c9fbc/lib/PolicyAPI.php' exceptionLine: '6776' exceptionCode: '0'

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

@trjExpensify hmmm... just to clarify. Are you sure that during your testing all changes were applied?
That's what i see on my branch:

Screen.Recording.2024-04-26.at.16.09.25.mov

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

let me retest..

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Okay yeah, better.. but now it looks like I can't select any accounts (they disappear after selected). Also, it looks like on the out of pocket export settings the values of the previously selected account choice remain.

2024-04-26_14-29-51.mp4

It's really littered with errors, which makes this hard. I created an issue here about the lack of default settings on connecting to QBO that includes selecting the first value from the account list where applicable. By way of a couple of examples:

  1. If Vendor bill is chosen for export, the first value in the Accounts payable list should be selected.
  2. If Credit card is chosen for export, the first value in the Account list should be selected.
    ... and so on.

As the OP of that issue highlights in points 2, 3 4 of the expected results section it should also happen when:

  • Turning on a setting which has account(s) that need to be selected

Example: If you enable Default vendor, the first value in the Vendor list should be selected.

  • Updating the export type from one export method to another

Example:

  1. Select Credit card for export
  2. Account menu item is shown
  3. The first value in the Account list should be selected i.e ("Amex Card Account")
  4. Change to Vendor bill export
  5. Account menu item is replaced with Accounts payable and the previous Account value is cleared
  6. The first value in the Accounts payable list is selected (i.e "Accounts Payable A/P")

I don't think those changes need backend work, and if not, I wonder if we just take care of them here to clean-up a bunch of these errors because they're not being selected? That would make this a lot easier to decipher what remains outstanding to be worked on.

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay yeah, better.. but now it looks like I can't select any accounts (they disappear after selected). Also, it looks like on the out of pocket export settings the values of the previously selected account choice remain.

2024-04-26_14-29-51.mp4
It's really littered with errors, which makes this hard. I created an issue here about the lack of default settings on connecting to QBO that includes selecting the first value from the account list where applicable. By way of a couple of examples:

  1. If Vendor bill is chosen for export, the first value in the Accounts payable list should be selected.
  2. If Credit card is chosen for export, the first value in the Account list should be selected.
    ... and so on.

As the OP of that issue highlights in points 2, 3 4 of the expected results section it should also happen when:

  • Turning on a setting which has account(s) that need to be selected

Example: If you enable Default vendor, the first value in the Vendor list should be selected.

  • Updating the export type from one export method to another

Example:

  1. Select Credit card for export
  2. Account menu item is shown
  3. The first value in the Account list should be selected i.e ("Amex Card Account")
  4. Change to Vendor bill export
  5. Account menu item is replaced with Accounts payable and the previous Account value is cleared
  6. The first value in the Accounts payable list is selected (i.e "Accounts Payable A/P")

I don't think those changes need backend work, and if not, I wonder if we just take care of them here to clean-up a bunch of these errors because they're not being selected? That would make this a lot easier to decipher what remains outstanding to be worked on.

yeah - checking - probably i missed some peace of code. And also will add default for all items

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

narefyev91 commented Apr 26, 2024

@trjExpensify how about this one (let me push fixes and you can play around again):

Screen.Recording.2024-04-26.at.17.35.38.mov

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

@trjExpensify pushed updates - let me know - when you will be able to re-check again

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Just seen this.. looking.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Do I need a fresh build?

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

(I have one running, hang fire).

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 26, 2024

Verify that Default vendor toggle row is now shown, but the toggle is disabled

This could be confusing. The toggle is switched off not disabled

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 26, 2024

Can't clear vendor switch error

Screen.Recording.2024-04-26.at.4.49.53.PM.mov

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Verify that Default vendor toggle row is now shown, but the toggle is disabled
This could be confusing. The toggle is switched off not disabled

Haha, that's what I mean. 😅 Switched off == disabled. Switched on == enabled.

Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

The adhoc build isn't reflecting the changes you've made recently here.

Comment on lines 92 to +93
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_ENTITY, row.value);
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_ACCOUNT, accountName);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines 71 to +75
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD, row.value);
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD_ACCOUNT);
if (row.value === CONST.QUICKBOOKS_EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD.VENDOR_BILL) {
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD_ACCOUNT);
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_ACCOUNT_PAYABLE, accountPayable?.[0]?.name);
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.AUTO_CREATE_VENDOR);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New record! 4 API calls 😅 cc @hayata-suenaga same question ^

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt is correct. This breaks the 1:1:1 API design and shouldn't be allowed.

Copy link
Contributor

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga Apr 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@narefyev91

also, can you remind me why we added this field to the config object? 😄
Screenshot 2024-04-30 at 12 33 55 PM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also this one
Screenshot 2024-04-30 at 12 36 15 PM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

were these values there before your PR? 🤔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes in the backend will be done in this GH issue to update several fields of the connections configuration object, but the issue description might need to be updated. cc: @aldo-expensify

There are fields I don't recognized, so I'd wait for @narefyev91's confirmation

Copy link
Contributor

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga Apr 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes these values were added in the PR.

Screenshot 2024-04-30 at 12 41 59 PM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these fields don't exist on the backend 🤔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We shouldn't be adding config fields that don't already exist. This is a sample working QBO config:

{
    "realmId": "2222",
    "credentials": {},
    "companyName": "Expensify",
    "autoSync": {
        "jobID": "11111111111",
        "enabled": true
    },
    "syncPeople": true,
    "syncItems": true,
    "markChecksToBePrinted": false,
    "reimbursableExpensesExportDestination": "bill",
    "nonReimbursableExpensesExportDestination": "credit_card",
    "reimbursableExpensesAccount": {
        "glCode": "",
        "name": "Accounts Payable",
        "currency": "USD",
        "id": "54"
    },
    "nonReimbursableExpensesAccount": {
        "glCode": "",
        "name": "Expensify Card Liability Account",
        "currency": "USD",
        "id": "135"
    },
    "autoCreateVendor": true,
    "hasChosenAutoSyncOption": true,
    "syncClasses": "REPORT_FIELD",
    "syncCustomers": "REPORT_FIELD",
    "syncLocations": "REPORT_FIELD",
    "exportDate": "LAST_EXPENSE",
    "lastConfigurationTime": 1714507864961,
    "syncTax": false,
    "enableNewCategories": true,
    "export": {
        "exporter": "aldo+testqbo56242@expensifail.com"
    },
    "nonReimbursableBillDefaultVendor": "NONE",
    "receivableAccount": {
        "glCode": "",
        "name": "Accounts Receivable",
        "currency": "USD",
        "id": "53"
    },
    "reimbursementAccountID": "93",
    "collectionAccountID": "93"
}

Comment on lines +77 to +78
const accountName = row.value === CONST.QUICKBOOKS_EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD.CREDIT_CARD ? creditCards?.[0]?.name : bankAccounts?.[0]?.name;
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD_ACCOUNT, accountName);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB. Shouldn't we clear EXPORT_ACCOUNT_PAYABLE too?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think it's not really needed - when user will switch to debit/credit card - EXPORT_ACCOUNT_PAYABLE will not be used anywhere

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 29, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native android
Android: mWeb Chrome mweb-chrome
iOS: Native ios
iOS: mWeb Safari mweb-safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari web
MacOS: Desktop desktop

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 29, 2024

@narefyev91 Can you please fix the lint issue

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

@narefyev91 Can you please fix the lint issue

yeah just sent fix for that

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 29, 2024

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #41032 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from tgolen April 29, 2024 15:24
@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Apr 29, 2024

Could you fix the conflicts please before I review this?

# Conflicts:
#	src/pages/workspace/accounting/qbo/export/QuickbooksCompanyCardExpenseAccountPage.tsx
#	src/pages/workspace/accounting/qbo/export/QuickbooksOutOfPocketExpenseConfigurationPage.tsx
@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could you fix the conflicts please before I review this?

Done!

vendors?.[0]?.name,
);
}
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.AUTO_CREATE_VENDOR, isOn);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This breaks the 1:1:1 API design rule (only one API request per user action).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hayata-suenaga @aldo-expensify can you guys confirm this is being worked on in this issue?

Copy link
Contributor

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga Apr 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, this is one of the bullet points in the linked PR 😄

When the admin changes the type of QBO account to export company card (non-reimbursable) expenses to, don't call two updatePolicyConnectionConfig twice to update exportCompanyCard and exportCompanyCardAccount fields. Instead, create a single Web Expensify command to update the both fields at once.

Comment on lines 71 to +75
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD, row.value);
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD_ACCOUNT);
if (row.value === CONST.QUICKBOOKS_EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD.VENDOR_BILL) {
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_COMPANY_CARD_ACCOUNT);
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.EXPORT_ACCOUNT_PAYABLE, accountPayable?.[0]?.name);
Connections.updatePolicyConnectionConfig(policyID, CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.QBO, CONST.QUICK_BOOKS_CONFIG.AUTO_CREATE_VENDOR);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt is correct. This breaks the 1:1:1 API design and shouldn't be allowed.

@narefyev91 narefyev91 requested a review from tgolen April 30, 2024 06:59
@narefyev91 narefyev91 requested a review from tgolen April 30, 2024 14:46
@tgolen tgolen changed the title Fix account menu item visibility + reset account values [HOLD] Fix account menu item visibility + reset account values May 2, 2024
@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented May 2, 2024

I'm putting a HOLD on this until https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/390731 so this doesn't mistakingly get merged before then.

@tgolen tgolen changed the title [HOLD] Fix account menu item visibility + reset account values [HOLD https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/390731] Fix account menu item visibility + reset account values May 2, 2024
@tgolen tgolen changed the title [HOLD https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/390731] Fix account menu item visibility + reset account values [HOLD Expensify/issues/390731] Fix account menu item visibility + reset account values May 2, 2024
@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

@narefyev91, could you merge the main branch? There were several changes currently made. I tried to test your branch, but there are several errors that were now resolved on the main branch (ex. navigating to the Export page crushes the app).

@@ -22,19 +22,19 @@ type CardListItem = ListItem & {
function QuickbooksCompanyCardExpenseAccountPayableSelectPage({policy}: WithPolicyConnectionsProps) {
const {translate} = useLocalize();
const styles = useThemeStyles();
const {accountsPayable} = policy?.connections?.quickbooksOnline?.data ?? {};
const {accountPayable} = policy?.connections?.quickbooksOnline?.data ?? {};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a memo for myself. Checked this field name is correct

Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 8 59 38 AM

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ function QuickbooksCompanyCardExpenseAccountSelectCardPage({policy}: WithPolicyC
const policyID = policy?.id ?? '';
const {exportCompanyCard, syncLocations} = policy?.connections?.quickbooksOnline?.config ?? {};
const isLocationEnabled = Boolean(syncLocations && syncLocations !== CONST.INTEGRATION_ENTITY_MAP_TYPES.NONE);
const {creditCards, bankAccounts, accountPayable} = policy?.connections?.quickbooksOnline?.data ?? {};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

memo: checked that these field names are correct

Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 9 01 06 AM

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

Closing the PR per this comment.

The work will be done in this PR by Aldo, which makes sure that the 1:1:1 pattern is honored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants