Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CP Staging] Revert "Bump expensify-common version" #42914

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Beamanator commented May 31, 2024

Reverts #42176

Because PR ^ causes #42888

cc @MonilBhavsar

Tests

Make sure these issues don't happen anymore:

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

@Beamanator Beamanator self-assigned this May 31, 2024
@Beamanator Beamanator requested a review from a team as a code owner May 31, 2024 11:13
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team May 31, 2024 11:14
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 31, 2024

@grgia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

Noting that another crash is probably caused by suspect PR. So we need to test it

#42890

Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

From my tests on Android:

  1. App didn't crash when editing the message w/ the mention, but editing did wipe the mention which was weird?
  2. Copying the room mention didn't cause a crash 👍 (though I couldn't paste it into a chat after copying, maybe that's the bug we were trying to fix?)

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

App didn't crash when editing the message w/ the mention, but editing did wipe the mention which was weird?

Yeah, that's weird. Did you removed the mention or it got automatically removed?

Copying the room mention didn't cause a crash 👍 (though I couldn't paste it into a chat after copying, maybe that's the bug we were trying to fix?)

Nice! No, I think we're trying to fix the bug when copying the announce mention crashes the app. It didn't crash, so looks good

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Beamanator commented May 31, 2024

Yeah, that's weird. Did you removed the mention or it got automatically removed?

It looks like it got automatically removed 🤔 i think that's actually already on prod, i've seen other "copy into the composer not working" issues on prod

@Beamanator Beamanator requested review from MonilBhavsar and removed request for grgia May 31, 2024 13:17
@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

Same behavior on iOS, the mention is removed when edited
Since the crash is fixed, I think we can proceed

Screen.Recording.2024-05-31.at.7.34.23.PM.mov

@MonilBhavsar MonilBhavsar changed the title Revert "Bump expensify-common version" [CP Staging] Revert "Bump expensify-common version" May 31, 2024
@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MonilBhavsar and I tested this in android & ios which is where the bugs occurred, so let's merge 🚀

@Beamanator Beamanator merged commit 968520a into main May 31, 2024
17 of 21 checks passed
@Beamanator Beamanator deleted the revert-42176-expensify-common-bump branch May 31, 2024 14:39
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
…n-bump

[CP Staging] Revert "Bump expensify-common version"

(cherry picked from commit 968520a)
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Beamanator commented May 31, 2024

Working well on iOS & android!

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.4.78-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.78-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants