Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle if push notification doesn't have a payload #47123

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

jp928
Copy link
Contributor

@jp928 jp928 commented Aug 9, 2024

Details

If a push notification was send without a payload, the App would crash.

Fixed Issues

$ #46820
PROPOSAL: $ #46820 (comment)

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. prepare a text with following contents:
{
  "Simulator Target Bundle": "com.expensify.chat.dev",
  "aps": {
    "alert": "Testing",
    "sound": "default",
    "badge": 1,
  },
}
  1. Run the project in a simulator with npm run ios
  2. Run the following command to see if the App still crash
xcrun simctl push  {simulator_uuid} com.expensify.chat.dev {path_to_the_file_in_step1}

QA Steps

1.Get a Hybrid App notification that an expense report has been reimbursed
2.Unlock phone (not even specifically opening the notification)
3. Verify that the app doesn't crash

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
andrid_native.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_web.webm
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-08-09.at.10.09.15.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.-.2024-08-09.at.10.16.09.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-08-09.at.10.17.36.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-08-09.at.10.22.21.AM.mov

@jp928 jp928 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 9, 2024 00:00
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from s77rt August 9, 2024 00:00
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 9, 2024

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team August 9, 2024 00:00
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 9, 2024

@jp928 Please do not raise PRs until assigned in the issue

Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems we have a type error, pushPayload.extras.payload is shown to have type JsonValue but it's not always the case as it can be undefined. I think we should fix this upstream. Then we can just fix the ts errors which will prevent the crash.

This assertion is also false

const data = payload as PushNotificationData

@jp928
Copy link
Contributor Author

jp928 commented Aug 23, 2024

@arosiclair @s77rt Updated with respecting comments.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 23, 2024

@jp928 Did you raise a PR? (#47123 (comment))

@jp928
Copy link
Contributor Author

jp928 commented Aug 23, 2024

@jp928 Did you raise a PR? (#47123 (comment))

$ urbanairship/react-native-airship#583

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 23, 2024

@jp928 Can you please create a patch so we can have the type corrected without waiting for the upstream PR to be merged

@rlepinski
Copy link

@s77rt I can get an airship patch out today with the PR

Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please apply same solution for other affected places (in editor search for: as PushNotificationData)

@jp928
Copy link
Contributor Author

jp928 commented Aug 23, 2024

Can you please apply same solution for other affected places (in editor search for: as PushNotificationData)

Thx. Just apply same cast as other places.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the airship package getting updated with this fix soon? If so, can we just use the new version instead of adding this patch?

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 23, 2024

@jp928

Just apply same cast as other places.

This is not what I meant. Actually the new cast is the correct one. What I meant is that in other places the payload can be undefined and we are still accessing fields on undefined e.g.

const parseNotificationAndReportIDs = (pushPayload: PushPayload) => {
let payload = pushPayload.extras.payload;
if (typeof payload === 'string') {
payload = JSON.parse(payload) as string;
}
const data = payload as PushNotificationData;
return {
notificationID: pushPayload.notificationId,
reportID: String(data.reportID),
};
};

@rlepinski
Copy link

Airship release - https://github.com/urbanairship/react-native-airship/releases/tag/19.2.1

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 24, 2024

@jp928 The QA steps are not clear (sending a notification without payload). Can you instead use the steps from the reported issue?

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 24, 2024

@jp928 Did you find a way to send a notification to the Android Emulator?

@jp928
Copy link
Contributor Author

jp928 commented Aug 24, 2024

@jp928 Did you find a way to send a notification to the Android Emulator?

Unfortunately no.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 25, 2024

@jp928 In QA Steps add a third step to verify that the app didn't crash

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 25, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from tgolen August 25, 2024 17:29
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 26, 2024

@jp928 Looks we have conflicts

@arosiclair arosiclair merged commit fb73863 into Expensify:main Aug 26, 2024
17 checks passed
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 26, 2024

@jp928 For future PRs please avoid force-pushing, it causes review progress to be lost and can't use the "Show changes since your last review" option. Instead merge main.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.0.25-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

1 similar comment
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.0.25-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants