Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feat] Make it possible to submit expenses to any workspace, whether or not there is a workspace chat #49412

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 ishpaul777 commented Sep 18, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #49344
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Test 1

  1. Create a workspace on ND. Go to workspace chat and copy report id in URL.
  2. Open Dev tools and delete report Data from onyx db report_<reportid>.
  3. Open any other report. and Reload the app.
  4. Click on FAB, -> Submit Expense -> Add any amount
  5. Verify you are able to see the deleted workspace chat option
  6. Click on workspace chat option submit expense, verify the expensse is submitted.

Test 2

  1. Create a Control workspace on OD. Sign in on ND with same account.
  2. Click on FAB, -> Submit Expense -> Add any amount
  3. Verify you are able to see the deleted workspace chat option
  4. Click on workspace chat option submit expense, verify the expensse is submitted.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Record_2024-10-18-03-41-41.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-10-18.at.3.19.32.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-18.at.2.52.34.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-18.at.2.12.46.AM.mov
Screen.Recording.2024-10-18.at.2.34.01.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-10-18.at.3.55.50.AM.mov

@ishpaul777 ishpaul777 changed the title adds v1 changes [Feat] Make it possible to submit expenses to any workspace, whether or not there is a workspace chat Sep 18, 2024
@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

not overdue

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

We need to update the RequestMoney API command to pass the policyID. That way if we're using an optimistic policyExpenseChat, we know which policy to create the chat on.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2024

@eVoloshchak Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eVoloshchak This is ready for review code wise, but BE is not deployed yet. I'll write test steps. but for now it can be tested only offline for now

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI BE PR is deployed on staging

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

For test 2 it needs to be a Control workspace. Collect workspaces created on OldDot are workspace chat enabled.

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated!

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

allroundexperts commented Oct 17, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Unable to test on Android native because Flipper doesn't allow me to run herms debugger on my android device.

Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.3.46.00.AM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.3.41.15.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.3.35.27.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.3.25.49.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.3.31.39.AM.mov

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

BUG

The onboarding model re-appears after refreshing the page.

Screen.Recording.2024-10-18.at.3.54.13.AM.mov

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

BUG

The created expense report switches its position in the LHN thrice.

Screen.Recording.2024-10-18.at.3.55.07.AM.mov

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

The onboarding model re-appears after refreshing the page. #49412 (comment)

I am not able to reproduce, is this happening consistently?

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 I was able to consistently reproduce it with new accounts. Maybe merge main and try?

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor Author

ishpaul777 commented Oct 18, 2024

Still cant reproduce

Screen.Recording.2024-10-18.at.8.29.22.PM.mov

@allroundexperts Have you checked if this is still repro on main?

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

On Android mwb, Not found page is shown for a small instant of time. I think this is related to the this bug that I pointed out earlier.

Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.3.46.00.AM.mov

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

Upon clearing my onyx data, I was not able to reproduce #49412 (comment) as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One potential bug report, but I think its related to another bug that we'll be handling from the backend. As such, I am approving it.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from puneetlath October 20, 2024 22:59
@puneetlath puneetlath merged commit 36a8b13 into Expensify:main Oct 21, 2024
18 of 22 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.0.52-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@mjasikowski
Copy link
Contributor

mjasikowski commented Oct 22, 2024

New feature, so not reverting

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

hi! I'm VERY not confident about this - but is there a chance that this caused #51256 ? I am having trouble reproducing it consistently on my local (it occurred once, and never again) but it does happen on the actual staging site. This PR looks like it modified tags in a way that MIGHT have caused it?

@flodnv
Copy link
Contributor

flodnv commented Oct 22, 2024

THis PR caused this DeployBlocker: #51249

@flodnv
Copy link
Contributor

flodnv commented Oct 22, 2024

I'm proposing we revert the PR: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1729612151981119

@blimpich
Copy link
Contributor

Decided to revert this PR to fix this deploy blocker: #51286

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.0.52-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants