-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hide approve/pay buttons if the report contains violations #51133
Merged
Gonals
merged 14 commits into
Expensify:main
from
abzokhattab:disable-approve-button-if-expense-has-violatiosn
Nov 25, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c8084ff
Hide approve button if report has violations
abzokhattab 3204148
Disable the pay button if the report has violaitons
abzokhattab f760f27
minor edit
abzokhattab 38a5650
minor edit
abzokhattab 7af0e6a
minor edit
abzokhattab 6c716bb
minor edit
abzokhattab 150d783
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into disable-approve-butto…
abzokhattab f3b40b8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into disable-approve-butto…
abzokhattab 91a0d0d
adding violations as an argument to the can approve and pay functions
abzokhattab 29e5c22
minor edit
abzokhattab c3a9f27
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into disable-approve-butto…
abzokhattab d53ec65
minor
abzokhattab 68ce50b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into disable-approve-butto…
abzokhattab 140bbaa
minor
abzokhattab File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any util that returns transaction violations? So we can get and pass here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can use
oynx.connect
to link to the transaction violations at the top of the file. However, from a performance perspective, I thought it would be better to make it optional and use the existing one in the IOU file as a fallback.let me know if you think we should use the
oynx.connect
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worry. I think it's fine for now. Can you do a quick test to ensure everything still good?