Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Onyx.clear handle collections and regular keys with an underscore #574

Conversation

hannojg
Copy link
Contributor

@hannojg hannojg commented Jul 30, 2024

Details

Warning: This PR is based on this PR, which should be merged before this one:

(otherwise some tests of this PR would fail)


The clear method wasn't working correctly for keys that have an underscore in their name, but are none-collection keys (e.g. nvp_isFirstTimeNewExpensifyUser).

With this PR and the aforementioned all expensify tests are passing (right now, when bumping to latest they are broken due to this PR)

Related Issues

#569

Automated Tests

Added a test that will run a bunch of modifications to a key which is using an underscore for its name. The succession of changes would fail without these changes.

Manual Tests

n/a, confirmed that the expensify test suite is passing

Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Related Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Note: Only tested and web and assumed other platforms to work (as this only concerned the .clear method which is called during logout)

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-07-30.at.22.19.32.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@techievivek
Copy link
Contributor

Assigned it to VIt and Marc since they have reviewed other PRs related to the GH #569

marcaaron
marcaaron previously approved these changes Aug 6, 2024
@hannojg hannojg dismissed marcaaron’s stale review August 6, 2024 17:28

The merge-base changed after approval.

marcaaron
marcaaron previously approved these changes Aug 6, 2024
@hannojg hannojg dismissed marcaaron’s stale review August 6, 2024 18:05

The merge-base changed after approval.

marcaaron
marcaaron previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2024
@hannojg hannojg dismissed marcaaron’s stale review August 7, 2024 01:24

The merge-base changed after approval.

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like something is auto-dismissing my reviews 😓

@hannojg
Copy link
Contributor Author

hannojg commented Aug 7, 2024

Oh wow thats weird, never had that happen before - I didn't do anything 😅 can you maybe write the review again?

mountiny
mountiny previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes, they make sense to me and automated tests were added

@hannojg hannojg dismissed mountiny’s stale review August 7, 2024 12:25

The merge-base changed after approval.

@hannojg
Copy link
Contributor Author

hannojg commented Aug 7, 2024

As this PR seems to be buggy I opened a new one here:

@hannojg hannojg closed this Aug 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants