Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the PR template to include a higher bar for quality #38

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2023

Conversation

tgolen
Copy link

@tgolen tgolen commented Jan 18, 2023

Summary

Many of the PRs in this fork do not follow the PR template and don't fill in the mandatory fields. They also rarely contain information about the corresponding upstream PR in a consistent manner which makes finding the upstream PR very difficult which makes upgrading versions of RN very difficult.

Changelog

[Internal] [Added] - Added an upstream PR field to the PR template

Test Plan

This can only be tested after this PR is merged.

  1. Create a PR
  2. Verify the new fields in the PR template are there

@tgolen tgolen requested a review from roryabraham January 18, 2023 22:41
@tgolen tgolen self-assigned this Jan 18, 2023
@tgolen tgolen requested a review from AndrewGable January 18, 2023 22:42
@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit 9837731 into main Jan 19, 2023
@roryabraham roryabraham deleted the tgolen-pull-request-template branch January 19, 2023 05:04
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Jan 19, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 19, 2023

@roryabraham looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@roryabraham
Copy link

This integration should probably not be enabled in this repo because we do not have it properly configured to run Facebook's CI, so tests always fail

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants