You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While testing / working with RunPlans and RunPlanVectors several potential improvements came up, but to avoid blocking bugfixes they're getting their own issue.
RunPlanVector::setPropertyUniformDistribution has a potentially misleading/ambiguos name, which is similar to setPropertyUniformRandom, which uses a Unform distribution. It should probably be renamed. It's more of a LERP imo, but there may be a more canonical name for this for similar use-cases.
operator== would be useful to compare RunPlan instances (and potentially RunPlanVectors) against one another. greatly simplifying some tests
RunPlanVector::at(size_t index). I.e. expose the vectors .at methods, which is operator[] with bounds checking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While testing / working with RunPlans and RunPlanVectors several potential improvements came up, but to avoid blocking bugfixes they're getting their own issue.
RunPlanVector::setPropertyUniformDistribution
has a potentially misleading/ambiguos name, which is similar tosetPropertyUniformRandom
, which uses a Unform distribution. It should probably be renamed. It's more of a LERP imo, but there may be a more canonical name for this for similar use-cases.operator==
would be useful to compareRunPlan
instances (and potentiallyRunPlanVector
s) against one another. greatly simplifying some testsRunPlanVector::at(size_t index)
. I.e. expose the vectors .at methods, which isoperator[]
with bounds checking.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: