-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A few tests fails #382
Comments
Here is for example a modified test_build_board() test. I am getting the error
|
... seems to be related to this code. If running in native mode, the packages are not verified. My test runs in native mode. I don't know what it means.
Test log
|
... the tests don't use apio.ini,
Should it be this instead?
|
I sent this pull request that fixes the tests. It has to do with 'native' exe mode. The PR supports it as before but can we drop it for simplicity? |
Let's keep the native mode exe by the moment. In this mode the installed apio packages are ignored and the tools installed in the system are used instead (for example you can install oss-cad-suite natively in your os for testing a new version). It is an advance feature for developers. It is not supposed to be user by normal users |
I will answer all your pending questions when I finish releasing Icestudio 0.12. Once it is done, we will start a new cycle and we can rethink apio/icestudio |
Sounds good.
…On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 2:01 AM Juan Gonzalez-Gomez < ***@***.***> wrote:
I will answer all your pending questions when I finish releasing Icestudio
0.12. Once it is done, we will start a new cycle and we can rethink
apio/icestudio
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#382 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQVMQLUU3E37DSV2FG75BLZHKWN3AVCNFSM6AAAAABJIYDCN6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRXGU4DANBYGE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
When I run the command
pytest apio test
at the root of apio_dev I am getting a few errors. Is this the right way to run the tests? Are they actually broken or it's something on my side? (If broken, I can try fixing them).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: