Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

staticd: add ability to create onlink static route #3190

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2018

Conversation

qlyoung
Copy link
Member

@qlyoung qlyoung commented Oct 16, 2018

Summary

Static route commands were lacking the ability to specify that a new static route should be marked onlink.

Components

staticd

Signed-off-by: Quentin Young qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com

Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
@qlyoung qlyoung requested a review from donaldsharp October 16, 2018 21:07
@donaldsharp
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Oct 16, 2018

💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

Results table
_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/3190 02dc8ba
Date 10/16/2018
Start 17:00:20
Finish 17:23:49
Run-Time 23:29
Total 1813
Pass 1813
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2018-10-16-17:00:20.txt
Log autoscript-2018-10-16-17:01:05.log.bz2

For details, please contact louberger

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-5661/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.


CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 3190, comparing to Git base SHA 4a99c19

No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base

@rwestphal rwestphal merged commit 705d21f into FRRouting:master Oct 18, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants