Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#65] Renderer API + Indigo #189

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 18, 2019
Merged

[#65] Renderer API + Indigo #189

merged 4 commits into from
May 18, 2019

Conversation

asiekierka
Copy link
Contributor

what

@asiekierka asiekierka added 0.3.x ready accepted This issue is a good idea and a PR should be made labels May 18, 2019
@asiekierka
Copy link
Contributor Author

Idea: Split away the DynamicModelBakeEntity/TerrainBlockView part of the API into its own module
as it could later be reused in a much simpler version of the patch if someone wants to, more akin to my initial proposal with just a view/pos-specific BakedModel
I just need more approvals for the idea, and a name for the module

I would also rename TerrainBlockView to something else, in that case. Should come with the name of the module, maybeh.

@asiekierka asiekierka mentioned this pull request May 18, 2019
*
* All renderer implementations should support standard materials.<p>
*
* <b>SHADER MATERIALS</b><p>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The docs for shader and special materials reference features that didn't make the cut and should probably be removed.

@asiekierka asiekierka merged commit 02a46d5 into FabricMC:master May 18, 2019
ThalusA pushed a commit to ThalusA/fabric that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022
Big thanks to Grondag and Player for all the pain and trouble we all went through.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted This issue is a good idea and a PR should be made
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants