Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix : rules to load client configuration to connect to a kubernetes cluster #419

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 10, 2023

Conversation

smehboub
Copy link
Contributor

@smehboub smehboub commented Nov 25, 2022

fix : rules to load client configuration to connect to a kubernetes cluster

This PR :
Fixes #418

Checklist

  • I have signed the CLA
  • I have updated/added any relevant documentation

Description

What's the goal of this PR?

The same rules to load client configuration for all commands that need to connect to a kubernetes cluster

What changes did you make?

Use the same way to load client configuration to connect to a kubernetes cluster as the detect-helm command for all commands

What alternative solution should we consider, if any?

None

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 25, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@smehboub
Copy link
Contributor Author

smehboub commented Dec 1, 2022

Hello @sudermanjr @transient1

Any news please ?

Thanks in advance.
Rgs,

Sophian

@smehboub
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @sudermanjr @transient1

Any news please ?

Thanks in advance.
Rgs,

Sophian

@aslafy-z
Copy link
Contributor

aslafy-z commented Feb 5, 2023

@smehboub can you please rebase your PR?

Copy link
Member

@sudermanjr sudermanjr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this needs a rebase now.

@smehboub
Copy link
Contributor Author

smehboub commented Feb 7, 2023

@smehboub can you please rebase your PR?

Hello @aslafy-z

Thanks you for feedbacks, It's done.

Rgs,

@smehboub
Copy link
Contributor Author

smehboub commented Feb 7, 2023

Looks like this needs a rebase now.

Hello @sudermanjr

Thanks you for feedbacks, It's done.

Rgs,

@smehboub smehboub force-pushed the fix/issue-418 branch 2 times, most recently from 93f8063 to 9bbfea2 Compare February 7, 2023 02:07
@transient1
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @smehboub . Just wanted to let you know I will be reviewing this PR over the next day or so.

@smehboub
Copy link
Contributor Author

smehboub commented Feb 8, 2023

Hi, @smehboub . Just wanted to let you know I will be reviewing this PR over the next day or so.

Thank you :-)

@smehboub smehboub requested review from aslafy-z and sudermanjr and removed request for sudermanjr and aslafy-z February 10, 2023 01:29
Copy link
Contributor

@transient1 transient1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for the contribution!

@smehboub
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM. Thanks for the contribution!

Thank you too :-)

@transient1 transient1 merged commit 3d62079 into FairwindsOps:master Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants