[Issue #524] Changed constructor usage #525
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tIdInfo.withAlwaysAsId(...) + Unit test
|
Makes sense. Is there a different issue for problem fixed with the patch? |
cowtowncoder
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2014
[Issue #524] Changed constructor usage
cowtowncoder
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2014
|
Nothing else, just the mentioned issue with the resolver. Unit test was adapted to verify the behavior. I also switched the class member private access to protected to be align it with others. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Used constructor with ObjectIdResolver in ObjectIdInfo.withAlwaysAsId(...) + Unit test