Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FOCUS #404: Service Subcategory #519

Merged
merged 79 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

shawnalpay
Copy link
Contributor

@shawnalpay shawnalpay commented Aug 16, 2024

Introduction of column ServiceSubcategory underneath the existing column ServiceCategory to capture finer grouping detail for Services.

Lead Maintainer: Shawn Alpay, @salpaysenturus

Documents:

@shawnalpay shawnalpay requested a review from a team as a code owner August 16, 2024 03:41
Copy link
Contributor

@jpradocueva jpradocueva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am volunteer to convert long markdown tables into HTML.

specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jpradocueva jpradocueva added the P1 label Aug 16, 2024
@jpradocueva jpradocueva added this to the v1.1 milestone Aug 16, 2024
@jpradocueva
Copy link
Contributor

jpradocueva commented Aug 19, 2024

Action Items, Maintainers meeting, Aug 19:

  • [Maintainer-##519] Shawn will assign specific reviewers for the PR and gather feedback through a controlled document.

Copy link
Contributor

@udam-f2 udam-f2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General comments around descriptions for categories is to keep them short, concise and not go into the uses / purpose - which starts to become marketing-ish

specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@shawnalpay
Copy link
Contributor Author

General comments around descriptions for categories is to keep them short, concise and not go into the uses / purpose - which starts to become marketing-ish

@udam-f2 Fair enough. Could you possibly make a suggestion on a specific description as an example, and I can extrapolate from there?

shawnalpay and others added 3 commits August 19, 2024 18:59
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
@udam-f2
Copy link
Contributor

udam-f2 commented Aug 20, 2024

General comments around descriptions for categories is to keep them short, concise and not go into the uses / purpose - which starts to become marketing-ish

@udam-f2 Fair enough. Could you possibly make a suggestion on a specific description as an example, and I can extrapolate from there?

I thought I provided my opinion on several of these. I think the consistent way might be to check ServiceCategory descriptions and try to keep it at that level. If we don't believe that serves the purpose, we should look to change the way descriptions are written in both.

@jpradocueva
Copy link
Contributor

jpradocueva commented Sep 11, 2024

Action Items from TF-1 call on Sep 10:

  • [TF1-#519] Michael: Update the subcategory proposal for serverless compute to include "Managed Compute" as an alternative.
  • [TF1-#519] Shawn: Continue exploring best categorization practices for search across cloud providers.
  • [TF1-#519] Michael: To update the PR, reflecting the new categories for development, deployment, and QA.
  • [TF1-#519] Alex: To review the categorization of multi-cloud vs. hybrid cloud for future discussion.
  • [TF1-#519] Shawn: To propose combining directory services with identity management and ensure alignment with security services.
  • [TF1-#519] All Members: To review existing service classifications and ensure they align with the new taxonomy in preparation for the next meeting.

@shawnalpay
Copy link
Contributor Author

shawnalpay commented Sep 11, 2024

Action Items from TF-1 call on Sep 10:

  • [TF1-#519] Michael: Update the subcategory proposal for serverless compute to include "Managed Compute" as an alternative.
  • [TF1-#519] Shawn: Continue exploring best categorization practices for search across cloud providers.
  • [TF1-#519] Michael: To update the PR, reflecting the new categories for development, deployment, and QA.
  • [TF1-#519] Alex: To review the categorization of multi-cloud vs. hybrid cloud for future discussion.
  • [TF1-#519] Shawn: To propose combining directory services with identity management and ensure alignment with security services.
  • [TF1-#519] All Members: To review existing service classifications and ensure they align with the new taxonomy in preparation for the next meeting.

@jpradocueva: I assume you sourced these action items from the recording, but we closed on most of these when we reopened the call after it was accidentally closed. The PR reflects those discussions, and as of the time of this writing, all comments have been resolved. The only applicable action item is the last one: for all members to review and comment/approve ahead of approval at this coming Thursday's Member meeting.

Copy link
Contributor

@thecloudman thecloudman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this has come a long way and is looking good. I'm supportive of the current format and categorization.

Copy link
Contributor

@udam-f2 udam-f2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs more work to flush out ambiguities and inconsistencies and drive consensus across a broad group.

specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/columns/servicesubcategory.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
@flanakin flanakin self-requested a review September 12, 2024 19:09
@jpradocueva
Copy link
Contributor

jpradocueva commented Sep 17, 2024

Action Items from Task Force 1 call on Sep 17:

  • [TF1-#519] Sean, @salpaysenturus : Update PR FOCUS #404: Service Subcategory #519 to reflect the final subcategory names and descriptions, particularly focusing on "development environments."
  • [TF1-#519] Michael, @flanakin : Review and confirm is ok with the final changes in the Slack channel before Thursday's meeting.

@jpradocueva
Copy link
Contributor

jpradocueva commented Sep 18, 2024

Action Items from TF-2 call on Sep 18:

  • [TF2-#519 ] Sean, @salpaysenturus : Make final changes to the PR descriptions as discussed and prepare for approval in tomorrow’s meeting.
  • [TF2-#519 ] All members: Review the finalized sub-categories in preparation for tomorrow's approval.

@jpradocueva
Copy link
Contributor

Approved by the group during the Member' call on Sep 19.

@jpradocueva jpradocueva merged commit e9f07d0 into working_draft Sep 20, 2024
2 checks passed
@jpradocueva jpradocueva deleted the 404-service-subcategories branch September 20, 2024 00:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: W.I.P
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for sub categorizations of ServiceCategory