-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FOCUS #404: Service Subcategory #519
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am volunteer to convert long markdown tables into HTML.
Action Items, Maintainers meeting, Aug 19:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
General comments around descriptions for categories is to keep them short, concise and not go into the uses / purpose - which starts to become marketing-ish
@udam-f2 Fair enough. Could you possibly make a suggestion on a specific description as an example, and I can extrapolate from there? |
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
I thought I provided my opinion on several of these. I think the consistent way might be to check ServiceCategory descriptions and try to keep it at that level. If we don't believe that serves the purpose, we should look to change the way descriptions are written in both. |
Action Items from TF-1 call on Sep 10:
|
@jpradocueva: I assume you sourced these action items from the recording, but we closed on most of these when we reopened the call after it was accidentally closed. The PR reflects those discussions, and as of the time of this writing, all comments have been resolved. The only applicable action item is the last one: for all members to review and comment/approve ahead of approval at this coming Thursday's Member meeting. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this has come a long way and is looking good. I'm supportive of the current format and categorization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needs more work to flush out ambiguities and inconsistencies and drive consensus across a broad group.
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
Co-authored-by: Udam Dewaraja <udam@finops.org>
Action Items from Task Force 1 call on Sep 17:
|
Approved by the group during the Member' call on Sep 19. |
Introduction of column ServiceSubcategory underneath the existing column ServiceCategory to capture finer grouping detail for Services.
Lead Maintainer: Shawn Alpay, @salpaysenturus
Documents:
Aug 29, Sep 5,