feat: add role-based access control for bridge

[tkxkd0159]

Description

closes: #XXXX

Motivation and context

How has this been tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Checklist:

• I followed the contributing guidelines and code of conduct.
• I have added a relevant changelog to CHANGELOG.md
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have updated API documentation client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 32.07856% with 415 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.52%. Comparing base (956d7a6) to head (3e332f7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            pjdp1    #1350      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.98%   69.52%   -0.46%     
==========================================
  Files         663      672       +9     
  Lines       55440    56107     +667     
==========================================
+ Hits        38800    39011     +211     
- Misses      14407    14833     +426     
- Partials     2233     2263      +30     

Files	Coverage Δ
simapp/app.go	80.06% <100.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/types/codec.go	54.54% <50.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/keeper/params.go	83.33% <83.33%> (ø)
x/fbridge/types/msgs.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/types/fbridge.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/types/params.go	42.42% <42.42%> (ø)
x/fbridge/keeper/keeper.go	67.85% <70.00%> (+17.85%)	⬆️
x/fbridge/types/keys.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/keeper/abci.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/fbridge/keeper/genesis.go	10.34% <8.33%> (+10.34%)	⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[zemyblue]

How about changing the panic message of unimplemented tx?

func (m msgServer) ClaimBatch(ctx context.Context, msg *types.MsgClaimBatch) (*types.MsgClaimBatchResponse, error) {
	panic("implement me")
}

How about Not supported or Not implemented? :)

Because this message will displayed as error when request this tx.