Replace old clipboard plugin with a new one in README

[VictoriousRaptor]

Replace the old clipboard plugin in our readme with jack's new one.

[gitstream-cm]

🥷 Code experts: Jack251970, jjw24

Jack251970, jjw24 have most 👩‍💻 activity in the files.
Jack251970 has most 🧠 knowledge in the files.

See details

README.md

Activity based on git-commit:

	Jack251970	jjw24
DEC		4 additions & 4 deletions
NOV		1 additions & 0 deletions
OCT	11 additions & 3 deletions
SEP	2 additions & 1 deletions	10 additions & 9 deletions
AUG		16 additions & 9 deletions
JUL

Knowledge based on git-blame:
Jack251970: 93%

✨ Comment /gs review for LinearB AI review. Learn how to automate it here.

[gitstream-cm]

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md was updated to replace a Clipboard History entry with Clipboard+ using a new repository URL and preview image. No functional code or structural changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Updates README.md	Updated Clipboard History entry to Clipboard+ with new repository URL and preview image

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

• cibere

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: replacing an old clipboard plugin reference with a new one in the README file.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining that the old clipboard plugin in the README is being replaced with a new one from Jack.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch VictoriousRaptor-patch-1

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f95d41e and d1518a4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

README.md

251-251: Images should have alternate text (alt text)

(MD045, no-alt-text)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
• GitHub Check: build

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

249-251: Both the GitHub repository and image URLs are accessible and functioning correctly. The repository returns HTTP 200, and the image asset returns HTTP 302 (a normal redirect response for GitHub user-attachments). No action needed.

[EnesEfeTokta]

Is there a specific reason for switching from Clipboard History to Clipboard+?

[VictoriousRaptor]

Is there a specific reason for switching from Clipboard History to Clipboard+?

not

Is there a specific reason for switching from Clipboard History to Clipboard+?

Hi, it's mainly because Clipboard History has not been updated for a long time (but doesn't mean it's not functioning) so we choose to feature the new clipboard+ on our readme.