Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add method to remove existing custom controls #35

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

paodb
Copy link
Member

@paodb paodb commented Sep 23, 2024

This is needed for FlowingCode/GoogleMapsAddon#128

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a method to remove custom controls from the map, enhancing user interface management.
  • Version Updates

    • Updated the package version for @flowingcode/google-map to 3.8.0.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the addition of a new method _removeCustomControls to the Polymer component in google-map.js, which manages the removal of custom control elements from both the shadow and light DOMs. Additionally, the version of the package @flowingcode/google-map has been updated from 3.7.1 to 3.8.0 in package.json, reflecting a minor version increment.

Changes

File Change Summary
google-map.js Added a method _removeCustomControls to manage the removal of custom control elements.
package.json Updated the version field from 3.7.1 to 3.8.0 for the package @flowingcode/google-map.

Poem

In the map where controls play,
A rabbit hops and clears the way.
With a flick of a paw, they disappear,
Custom slots gone, oh what cheer!
Version's up, a leap ahead,
Hoppy changes, onward we tread! 🐇✨


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b270ed4 and 0bd8976.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (2)
  • google-map.js (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
package.json (2)

4-4: Version update looks good.

The version bump from 3.7.1 to 3.8.0 is appropriate for adding new functionality (removing existing custom controls) as mentioned in the PR objectives. This follows semantic versioning principles.


4-4: Verify documentation updates.

While the version update is correct, please ensure that any relevant documentation (README, CHANGELOG, etc.) has been updated to reflect the new functionality for removing existing custom controls.

google-map.js (3)

Line range hint 1-986: Overall assessment: Implementation meets objectives with room for minor improvements

The new _removeCustomControls method successfully implements the functionality to remove existing custom controls, meeting the PR objectives. The method is well-integrated with the existing customControls property and related methods.

Summary of suggestions:

  1. Add error handling and documentation to the _removeCustomControls method.
  2. Verify the impact of setting this.customControls to null on other parts of the code.
  3. Consider updating the _loadCustomControls method to handle cases where custom controls have been removed.

These improvements will enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code.


Line range hint 474-478: Verify integration with existing code

The _removeCustomControls method interacts with the customControls property. Let's ensure it's properly integrated:

  1. The customControls property is correctly defined in the properties object.
  2. Consider updating the _loadCustomControls method to handle cases where custom controls have been removed.
  3. Verify if there are any other methods that should be updated to use _removeCustomControls.

Let's search for other occurrences of customControls to ensure proper integration:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of customControls
rg "customControls" --type js

979-985: Implementation looks good, but consider some improvements.

The new _removeCustomControls method successfully implements the functionality to remove existing custom controls. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. Consider adding error handling to manage any potential issues during the removal process.
  2. It would be beneficial to add JSDoc comments to document the method's purpose and behavior.
  3. Setting this.customControls to null might impact other parts of the code. Verify that this doesn't cause unintended side effects.

Here's a suggested improvement with error handling and documentation:

+  /**
+   * Removes all custom controls from the map and DOM.
+   * @private
+   */
   _removeCustomControls() {
     if(this.map && this.customControls) {
-      this.customControls = null;
-      this.shadowRoot.querySelectorAll('[name^="customControlSlot_"]').forEach(controlSlot => controlSlot.parentElement.remove());
-      this.querySelectorAll('[slot^="customControlSlot_"]').forEach(controlButton => controlButton.remove());
+      try {
+        this.shadowRoot.querySelectorAll('[name^="customControlSlot_"]').forEach(controlSlot => controlSlot.parentElement.remove());
+        this.querySelectorAll('[slot^="customControlSlot_"]').forEach(controlButton => controlButton.remove());
+        this.customControls = null;
+      } catch (error) {
+        console.error('Error removing custom controls:', error);
+      }
     }
   },

To verify the impact of setting this.customControls to null, let's search for its usage:

Verification successful

Verified that setting this.customControls to null does not impact other parts of the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of this.customControls
rg "this\.customControls" --type js

Length of output: 399


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of this.customControls
rg 'this\.customControls' --type js

Length of output: 283


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@javier-godoy javier-godoy merged commit 82956da into master Sep 25, 2024
@javier-godoy javier-godoy deleted the issue-128 branch September 25, 2024 12:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants