-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use fallback for reshape/cat OneHotArray #1459
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
02d601e
Use fallback for reshape(::OneHotArray, ...)
darsnack 0cd9948
Use fallback for vcat(::OneHotArray...) as well
darsnack 2835923
Added support for ReshapedArray{T, N, <:OneHotArray} to hit fast one-hot
darsnack 9780b21
Check for one-hotness on fast paths instead of ReshapedArray constructor
darsnack d27139f
Apply suggestions from code review
darsnack File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Man this N+1 is tripping me up, I would say we need to remove this soon. Where is it used exactly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think we could calculate var"N+1" during runtime?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't like it either! It can't be done at runtime since
N
andvar"N+1"
are used in the type specification.N
is used to specify the type of the index array, andvar"N+1"
is used to inherit fromAbstractArray{Bool, var"N+1"}
. Neither is evaluated at runtime.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could change it to another variable. I don't have strong feelings, but a part of me says that at least this naming signals the intent of the type parameter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be fair, I did mean we would have to switch it out during construction, because I don't think it's any better for dispatch to have to do checks on ints than types. To me it suggests that it is a preknown quantity so adding it to the type doesn't win us much.