Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add
lppool
implementation #447Add
lppool
implementation #447Changes from 6 commits
9cad84b
ccd53cc
07c2d02
867f37c
bf94c17
671371d
909378c
e78bd1b
7572ea0
d075827
92f0327
1f6e68f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe worth noting that this
similar
means that lower-precision input gives the correct output without promotion, and that integer input fails here (unlike other pooling):There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can this explain a bit more?
It should say that it requires
ndims(x) == length(k)+2
.I think it should also say
lppool(x, 1, k) ./ prod(k) ≈ meanpool(x, k)
, and maybelppool(x, 2, k).^2 ./ prod(k) ≈ meanpool(x.^2, k)
.What range of
p
is allowed? E.g. someone might expectlppool(reshape(1:10.0,:,1,1), Inf, (3,))
to be maxpool, but it isn't... maybe anything which works fornorm
but not here should be an error?Can it briefly say what types are allowed for
stride, pad
, or refer to fuller docs elsewhere?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PyTorch layer docstring would be a good inspiration for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I add docs for these aspects in new commit.
I wonder if it might be suitable to write super detailed docs here. Flux.jl would wrap pooling layer after all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Our docstrings for
meanpool
andmaxpool
are quite short. Given that LP-pooling is far less well known however, it warrants a bit more explanation.