This repository has been archived by the owner on May 11, 2023. It is now read-only.
Fix #76. Ensure controller API only operates on elements animated by corresponding hook. #80
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #76
This PR fixes a 🐛 introduced by v0.6.1. In the creation of our
use<Force>Group
hooks we introduced the concept of using aSet
ofanimatingElements
to manage handling multiple animating elements at once. This worked out great, but ourSet
was scoped at the module level rather than at the function level. This meant that, if you had multiplerenature
hooks running at the same time in the same React tree, thestop
,start
, andpause
functions returned by any one of those hooks would act on all animating elements.This PR fixes that by moving our
animatingElements
Set
inside of function scope. This means each hook gets its ownSet
and manages its own instance ofrequestAnimationFrame
. This is good – we want separate hook calls to maintain fully isolated state and behavior.There are a few additional changes in here to improve our types and begin to DRY out some of the behavior of these hooks to make it easier to maintain moving forward 💪 Hoping to shave a few bytes with these changes!