Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lean binary distribution of app (ft. JXL lib)? #341

Closed
6 of 7 tasks
goyalyashpal opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
6 of 7 tasks

lean binary distribution of app (ft. JXL lib)? #341

goyalyashpal opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@goyalyashpal
Copy link

goyalyashpal commented Oct 22, 2024

Checklist

  • I made sure that there are no existing issues - open or closed - to which I could contribute my information.
  • I made sure that there are no existing discussions - open or closed - to which I could contribute my information.
  • I have read the FAQs inside the app (Menu -> About -> FAQs) and my problem isn't listed.
  • I have taken the time to fill in all the required details. I understand that the bug report will be dismissed otherwise.
  • This issue contains only one feature request.
  • I have read and understood the contribution guidelines.
  • I optionally donated to support the Fossify mission.

Feature description

yes, the nearly tripled application size is indeed a concern.

  • Gallery/CHANGELOG.md

    Lines 14 to 15 in 5054b37

    * Added initial support for JPEG XL format (increased app size)
    * Other minor bug fixes and improvements

    • if application size with JXL library is a concern, I think JXL could be moved to a separately installed plugin.
    • I don't know how that's exactly done, I'm afraid, but I've seen some apps doing that.

    Originally posted by @mgorny in Add JPEG XL support #3 (comment)

Why do you want this feature?

  • after quick pic app went down, i was now using fossify ...
  • on an old "android one" device (NOT to be confused with android v1 lol), ...
  • which are very low on resource availability combined with android's stupid restriction on "cant move apps to external sd card" ...
  • and 16.5 MiB (v1.1.3) to 42.1 MiB (v1.2.1) is just a bit too much for extremely limited internal storage of these devices

Additional information

No response

@Aga-C Aga-C closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 22, 2024
@Aga-C Aga-C added the template ignored The user didn't follow the template/instructions (or removed them) label Oct 22, 2024
@goyalyashpal
Copy link
Author

goyalyashpal commented Oct 22, 2024

added the template missing label 1 hour ago

this issue was created directly from another issue, and no prompt for template is shorn in that case. its understandable to close without any manual poke when someone deliberately ignores the template.

but i think u should have been considerate here due to github's limitation of not prompting for a template while "reference this comment in new issue"

@goyalyashpal
Copy link
Author

/remove_label ~template_missing

@Aga-C Aga-C removed the template ignored The user didn't follow the template/instructions (or removed them) label Oct 22, 2024
@Aga-C Aga-C closed this as completed Oct 22, 2024
@Aga-C Aga-C converted this issue into discussion #342 Oct 22, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants