Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

phonespamfilter data source always returns 0 = SPAM #277

Open
wa4zlw opened this issue Mar 18, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

phonespamfilter data source always returns 0 = SPAM #277

wa4zlw opened this issue Mar 18, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@wa4zlw
Copy link

wa4zlw commented Mar 18, 2016

subject says it all

@jfinstrom
Copy link
Contributor

If you curl the URL
http://www.phonespamfilter.com/check.php?phone=555555555
it takes almost 10 seconds and we time out after 3.
In a browser the same url takes ~500ms
For whatever reason their servers are not being nice to curl requests.

@lgaetz
Copy link
Contributor

lgaetz commented Apr 25, 2016

No expert here, perhaps they treat user agents differently.

@jfinstrom
Copy link
Contributor

That was my original thought so I also tried passing a user agent and it had no affect

@wa4zlw
Copy link
Author

wa4zlw commented Apr 25, 2016

so can this be fixed?

Leon

On 4/25/2016 2:30 PM, James Finstrom wrote:

That was my original thought so I also tried passing a user agent and
it had no affect


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#277 (comment)

@wa4zlw
Copy link
Author

wa4zlw commented Apr 25, 2016

I set timeout to 15 seconds and it still returns same thing

On 4/25/2016 6:41 PM, Leon Zetekoff wrote:

so can this be fixed?

Leon

On 4/25/2016 2:30 PM, James Finstrom wrote:

That was my original thought so I also tried passing a user agent and
it had no affect


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#277 (comment)

@jfinstrom
Copy link
Contributor

Anything over a couple hundred milliseconds is probably unreasonable. I have sent an email to their contact but being it is a free service they may not be overly responsive. It is on them for the time being. I recommend using another source or maybe contact them yourself if you wish

@wa4zlw
Copy link
Author

wa4zlw commented Apr 26, 2016

Hi James....agreed on that. I am checking multiple sources but this one
is user updated and you get spam hits faster.

Also, did you see my other ticket regarding on what variables can be
used in the SEND TO EMAIL datasource?

many thanks leon

On 4/25/2016 11:24 PM, James Finstrom wrote:

Anything over a couple hundred milliseconds is probably unreasonable.
I have sent an email to their contact but being it is a free service
they may not be overly responsive. It is on them for the time being. I
recommend using another source or maybe contact them yourself if you wish


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#277 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants