Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Another proposals to multi get PR #2420

Conversation

xgreenx
Copy link
Collaborator

@xgreenx xgreenx commented Oct 31, 2024

Since this PR add into_bytes for the encoder, we can optimize the batch mutate operations as well #2396 (review)

@xgreenx xgreenx requested a review from netrome October 31, 2024 11:13
@xgreenx xgreenx self-assigned this Oct 31, 2024
@MitchTurner
Copy link
Member

I guess you don't really need reviews.

@netrome
Copy link
Contributor

netrome commented Oct 31, 2024

I guess you don't really need reviews.

Reviews are always nice :)

Copy link
Contributor

@netrome netrome left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice :)

@netrome netrome merged commit 79e42da into 2344-add-support-for-multi-get-operation-in-the-database Oct 31, 2024
21 of 22 checks passed
@netrome netrome deleted the feature/proposals-to-multi-get-pr branch October 31, 2024 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants