Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consolidate ci and optimize build commands #604

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Sep 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Voxelot
Copy link
Member

@Voxelot Voxelot commented Sep 9, 2022

In our CI we had both cargo make build and cargo check --locked which were doing basically the same things. This PR merges them together using a custom cargo make task. It also uses the cargo make gh action to avoid slower rust based caching.

It also includes fuel-p2p in the normal test pipeline since there hasn't been any flakiness lately.

ellioty
ellioty previously approved these changes Sep 10, 2022
mitchmindtree
mitchmindtree previously approved these changes Sep 13, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@mitchmindtree mitchmindtree left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've no experience with cargo make but that comment is a big help! Interesting stuff, I knew there were issues with cargo's feature unification but didn't realise they were that bad. It'll be especially good to keep this in mind w.r.t. potential feature support in sway/forc.

Anyways, Lgtm!

Makefile.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Makefile.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Voxelot Voxelot dismissed stale reviews from mitchmindtree and ellioty via 2a92c19 September 13, 2022 05:09
@Voxelot Voxelot enabled auto-merge (squash) September 13, 2022 17:29
@Voxelot Voxelot merged commit c5e7ed1 into master Sep 13, 2022
@Voxelot Voxelot deleted the Voxelot/cargo-make branch September 13, 2022 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants