feat: Parse Logs and LogData #517
Conversation
| @@ -234,20 +234,23 @@ describe('Coverage Contract', () => { | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
| it('should test u8 vector input', async () => { | |||
| const { value, transactionResult } = await contractInstance.functions | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the test to read the logs
Coverage report
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
Test suite run success503 tests passing in 44 suites. Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from de884eb |
QuinnLee
force-pushed
the
ql/parse-log-logData
branch
from
ce2a493 to
de884eb
Compare
QuinnLee
requested review from
luizstacio,
camsjams and
LuizAsFight
and removed request for
luizstacio and
camsjams
| this.fragments = coerceFragments(ABI.unflatten(jsonAbi)); | ||
|
|
||
| this.types = this.abi ? this.abi.types : []; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this isn't used, but my ocd kicked in and I added it. It can be removed
| parseLoggedType(loggedType: JsonFlatAbiFragmentLoggedType): JsonAbiFragmentType { | ||
| return ParamType.fromObject(this.parseInput(loggedType.loggedType) as JsonFragmentType); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was much easier to reuse the current logic - but this should be cleaned up asap
| @@ -234,20 +234,23 @@ describe('Coverage Contract', () => { | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
| it('should test u8 vector input', async () => { | |||
| const { value, transactionResult } = await contractInstance.functions | |||
| const { value, logs } = await contractInstance.functions | |||
| return this.loggedTypes.map((loggedType) => ({ | ||
| ...loggedType, | ||
| abiFragmentType: [this.parseLoggedType(loggedType)], | ||
| })); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought the non-flat ABI is no more? @luizstacio maybe I misunderstood
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is correct. My understanding is that we unflatten it to make it work with the code. We really need to refactor the how the coders and ABI interact because this is where the tech debt is
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The idea behind keeping the nonthe flat abi, was to keep possible partial definition of functions using objects. But once logs and other things are going to require types. We should remove it.
Closes #491
First, pass on log and log data.
I tried to refactor the logic to decode these values, but it quickly grew out of scope. I think the good place to start refactors are on the
ABI,InterfaceandInvocationResults.WIP - More tests while getting this into review