Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release/1.53.0 #3252

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024
Merged

Release/1.53.0 #3252

merged 30 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

andrewpai
Copy link
Contributor

Release notes and user docs for 1.53.0.

spwitt and others added 9 commits September 4, 2024 14:45
* add webhookEventLogConfiguration to system config
* document webhook_event_log_viewer role
* doc for retrieving webhook event log APIs
* document webhook event log admin UI
* add doc for new loginIntent TTL
* add doc for fusionauth.li cookie
* java 21 note

* wording
@andrewpai andrewpai requested review from a team as code owners September 5, 2024 20:42
spwitt
spwitt previously approved these changes Sep 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@spwitt spwitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I fixed an outdated version reference for introduction of webhook event logs.

2. Add missing Docker image removal.
3. Move new lambda function from Changed to New.
4. Move new action buttons from Changed to Enhancements. Changed should be reserved for things that will potentially affect integrations.
5. Normalize "Update dependencies." and "Update 3rd party dependencies."
6. Expand upon the potential impact to the connection pool changes.
7. Correct formatting in release notes for 1.50.0.
8. Use the correct form of BreadCrumbs.
…not document `null`, instead we should indicate when a field will be omitted from the response.

2. Be more consistent with the definition of the Id.
3. Delete dead imports (EventTypes and InlineField) in _webhook-attempt-log-response-body-base.mdx.
2. Don't mention the LoginLambdaValidationContext, this is an internal object.
3. context is read only.
4. Mention when identityProvider is found in the context.
5. Fix broken link to error doc.
6. Don't use fully qualified URLS to docs, use relative links.
7. Remove trailing comma on JSON example
7. Discuss localization.
- Rename LambdaTypeApi -> LambdaTypeAPI
- Describe the behavior differences in optional messages for themes in 1.53.0.
Copy link
Contributor

@alex-fusionauth alex-fusionauth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wondering about this image using 1.53?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this have 1.53 in the screenshot?

---
{ since && <span class="pl-3 text-red-700 italic">Deprecated since {since}</span> }
{ since && hasContent && <span class="text-red-700 italic">Deprecated since {since}</span> <div class="prose-p:mt-1"><slot></slot></div> }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we adding a slot here? The rest of these components just specifically format a single value and are not structural. Probably need those class-like components in their own directory to differentiate them from the others here.

… DeprecatedSince

- Remove old system config reference
- Remove dead imports
@@ -1,8 +1,20 @@
---
interface Props {
since: string;
inline: boolean,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this field looks optional based on how it is used

const { inline, since }: Props = Astro.props;
const hasContent = Astro.slots.has("default");
let classList = 'text-red-700 italic';
if (inline) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is confusing to me. The span is inline by default, it looks like what you are going for is just to minimize the margin between the next line of text. I don't think we need a new div for that. Or is this meant to actually encapsulate the content in a meaningful way? Should it be an aside?

robotdan
robotdan previously approved these changes Sep 6, 2024
@andrewpai andrewpai merged commit 5ab93a1 into main Sep 6, 2024
@andrewpai andrewpai deleted the release/1.53.0 branch September 6, 2024 23:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants