Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[intrinsic-width] Firefox 66 is still affected by #1 (only width supported) #4883

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 24, 2019
Merged

[intrinsic-width] Firefox 66 is still affected by #1 (only width supported) #4883

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
503b419
Firefox 66 is still affected by #1 (only width supported)
polarathene Apr 20, 2019
c1f0625
[intrinsic-width] Add note for newer Firefox versions
polarathene Apr 20, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
13 changes: 7 additions & 6 deletions features-json/intrinsic-width.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -103,9 +103,9 @@
"63":"a x #1 #2 #3",
"64":"a x #1 #2 #3",
"65":"a x #1 #2 #3",
"66":"y #2",
"67":"y #2",
"68":"y #2"
"66":"a #2 #5",
"67":"a #2 #5",
"68":"a #2 #5"
},
"chrome":{
"4":"n",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@
"73":"y #3 #4"
},
"and_ff":{
"66":"y #2"
"66":"a x #2 #5"
},
"ie_mob":{
"10":"n",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -340,9 +340,10 @@
"notes":"Prefixes are on the values, not the property names (e.g. -webkit-min-content)\r\n\r\nOlder webkit browsers also support the unofficial `intrinsic` value which acts the same as `max-content`.",
"notes_by_num":{
"1":"Firefox does not support the `height`/`min-height`/`max-height` properties, only `width`. See [test case](https://codepen.io/shshaw/pen/Kiwaz), [Firefox bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=567039).",
"2":"Firefox supports the `-moz-available` keyword rather than `stretch`. [Firefox bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1495868)",
"2":"Firefox supports the `-moz-available` keyword rather than `stretch`. [Firefox bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1495868).",
"3":"Does not support the `flex-basis` property. See [specs](https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-flexbox-1-20150514/#flex-basis-property), [Blink bug](https://codereview.chromium.org/1304853002/), [Firefox bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1055887).",
"4":"Chrome does not yet unprefix `stretch` (aka `fill`/`fill-available`), because the [CSSWG](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0127.html) is not ready for that yet. See [Chromium bug](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git/+/bf119cdfece210e69c9a99af06f1b9981e2a1bc2)"
"4":"Chrome does not yet unprefix `stretch` (aka `fill`/`fill-available`), because the [CSSWG](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0127.html) is not ready for that yet. See [Chromium bug](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git/+/bf119cdfece210e69c9a99af06f1b9981e2a1bc2).",
"5":"While still being affected by note 1, it is only for `-moz-fit-content` and `-moz-available`."
},
"usage_perc_y":73.75,
"usage_perc_a":17.75,
Expand Down