Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add GNU UFS-Like CI test #2819

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 14, 2024
Merged

Add GNU UFS-Like CI test #2819

merged 2 commits into from
May 14, 2024

Conversation

mathomp4
Copy link
Member

@mathomp4 mathomp4 commented May 9, 2024

Types of change(s)

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Trivial change (affects only documentation or cleanup)

Checklist

  • Tested this change with a run of GEOSgcm
  • Ran the Unit Tests (make tests)

Description

This adds a GNU UFS-like test to our CI. No reason to only do Intel.

Related Issue

@mathomp4 mathomp4 added 0 Diff Trivial The changes in this pull request are trivially zero-diff (documentation, build failure, &c.) 🔧 Github Actions Automatic or GitHub Actions labels May 9, 2024
@mathomp4 mathomp4 self-assigned this May 9, 2024
@mathomp4 mathomp4 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 9, 2024 13:11
@tclune tclune merged commit 910fe5b into develop May 14, 2024
36 checks passed
@tclune tclune deleted the feature/mathomp4/add-gnu-ufs-ci branch May 14, 2024 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tclune tclune tclune approved these changes

Assignees

@mathomp4 mathomp4

Labels
0 Diff Trivial The changes in this pull request are trivially zero-diff (documentation, build failure, &c.) 🔧 Github Actions Automatic or GitHub Actions
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mathomp4 @tclune