missing line from prior merge

[rtodling]

I talked to Matt about this, there is a missing line from a prior merge of his; w/o it, CRTM complies but does not run properly in the context of GSI. After talking to Matt, I placed the missing line back.

[tclune]

@rtodling -free is not portable and appears to be unnecessary here. All extant compilers (except IBM which we don't use) will by default assume free format for files with .f90 and .F90 suffixes.

If this is needed, just ping me and I'll go in and approve. And then will ask @mathomp4 to follow up by creating a patch for esma_cmake to include a generic option for forcing free format.

[mathomp4]

@rtodling -free is not portable and appears to be unnecessary here. All extant compilers (except IBM which we don't use) will by default assume free format for files with .f90 and .F90 suffixes.

If this is needed, just ping me and I'll go in and approve. And then will ask @mathomp4 to follow up by creating a patch for esma_cmake to include a generic option for forcing free format.

Well, I just looked at Intel and that is the case:

              Description:

              This option specifies source files are in free format. If this option is not specified, format is determined as follows:

              o Files with an extension of .f90, .F90, or .i90 are free-format source files.

              o Files with an extension of .f, .for, .FOR, .ftn, or

So, I think the -free can be removed in this case. There are no .f files in the CRTM so everything is free format.

[mathomp4]

I think for now we'll just let this get in as @rtodling has tested it. I'll make a PR to remove -free after we release to keep it clean.

First, though, I need to fix the CI. Hold please...