-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 406
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HGV access restrictions #235
Comments
UPDATE Consider revising these settings to allow routing of |
Roads with Consider keeping ways tagged as |
What is the status of this as in the new release it does not go down the direct way? |
It does not route down the direct way because it is of
The actual test cases for #366 have been listed in my last post above. |
Access restrictions/permissions doesn't seem to be properly resolved for
driving-*
profiles. Consider the following example fordriving-hgv
withvehicle_type=agricultural
:https://maps.openrouteservice.org/directions?n1=49.465&n2=8.658385&n3=15&a=49.469532,8.658686,49.464359,8.660789&b=4d&c=0&k1=en-US&k2=km
The direct route is not found even though the way has the OSM tag
access=agricultural
.Interestingly, the same route is returned for
driving-car
despite that these roads are restricted to agricultural usage: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/AL3. UPDATE:access=agricultural
alone just permits agricultural usage without restricting it for regular traffic unless used in combination withmotor_vehicle
restrictions such asThings get even more funky when profile restrictions, such as
hazmat=true
are enabled. Then the route above changes the one below, even though there are no hazmat restrictions in this area! Seems to be related to #209 and #211.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: