Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix/#1177 waterway lock gate #1180

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 3, 2022
Merged

Conversation

koebi
Copy link
Collaborator

@koebi koebi commented Jun 2, 2022

Pull Request Checklist

  • 1. I have rebased the latest version of the master branch into my feature branch and all conflicts
    have been resolved.
  • 2. I have added information about the change/addition to functionality to the CHANGELOG.md file under the
    [Unreleased] heading.
  • [ ] 3. I have documented my code using JDocs tags.
  • 4. I have removed unnecessary commented out code, imports and System.out.println statements.
  • 5. I have written JUnit tests for any new methods/classes and ensured that they pass.
  • [ ] 6. I have created API tests for any new functionality exposed to the API.
  • [ ] 7. If changes/additions are made to the ors-config.json file, I have added these to the ors config documentation
    along with a short description of what it is for, and documented this in the Pull Request (below).
  • 8. I have built graphs with my code of the Heidelberg.osm.gz file and run the api-tests with all test passing
  • 9. I have referenced the Issue Number in the Pull Request (if the changes were from an issue).
  • [ ] 10. For new features or changes involving building of graphs, I have tested on a larger dataset
    (at least Germany), and the graphs build without problems (i.e. no out-of-memory errors).
  • 11. For new features or changes involving the graphbuilding process (i.e. changing encoders, updating the
    importer etc.), I have generated longer distance routes for the affected profiles with different options
    (avoid features, max weight etc.) and compared these with the routes of the same parameters and start/end
    points generated from the current live ORS.
    If there are differences then the reasoning for these MUST be documented in the pull request.
  • 12. I have written in the Pull Request information about the changes made including their intended usage
    and why the change was needed.
  • [ ] 13. For changes touching the API documentation, I have tested that the API playground renders correctly.

Fixes #1177 .

@koebi koebi requested a review from takb June 2, 2022 09:18
@koebi koebi requested a review from aoles June 2, 2022 09:18
Copy link
Member

@aoles aoles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for your prompt fix!

Do you think you could add a line to the CHANGELOG file as well? Cheers!

Copy link
Member

@aoles aoles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

@takb takb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@takb takb merged commit daa6741 into master Jun 3, 2022
@takb takb deleted the bugfix/#1177-waterway-lock-gate branch June 3, 2022 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Include waterway:lock_gate in (pedestrian) routing
3 participants