Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

optional parameter force_turn_costs #1221

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2022
Merged

Conversation

takb
Copy link
Contributor

@takb takb commented Oct 5, 2022

Pull Request Checklist

  • 1. I have [rebased][rebase] the latest version of the master branch into my feature branch and all conflicts
    have been resolved.
  • 2. I have added information about the change/addition to functionality to the CHANGELOG.md file under the
    [Unreleased] heading.
  • 3. I have documented my code using JDocs tags.
  • 4. I have removed unnecessary commented out code, imports and System.out.println statements.
  • 5. I have written JUnit tests for any new methods/classes and ensured that they pass.
  • 6. I have created API tests for any new functionality exposed to the API.
  • 7. If changes/additions are made to the ors-config.json file, I have added these to the [ors config documentation][config]
    along with a short description of what it is for, and documented this in the Pull Request (below).
  • 8. I have built graphs with my code of the Heidelberg.osm.gz file and run the api-tests with all test passing
  • 9. I have referenced the Issue Number in the Pull Request (if the changes were from an issue).
  • 10. For new features or changes involving building of graphs, I have tested on a larger dataset
    (at least Germany), and the graphs build without problems (i.e. no out-of-memory errors).
  • 11. For new features or changes involving the graphbuilding process (i.e. changing encoders, updating the
    importer etc.), I have generated longer distance routes for the affected profiles with different options
    (avoid features, max weight etc.) and compared these with the routes of the same parameters and start/end
    points generated from the current live ORS.
    If there are differences then the reasoning for these MUST be documented in the pull request.
  • 12. I have written in the Pull Request information about the changes made including their intended usage
    and why the change was needed.
  • 13. For changes touching the API documentation, I have tested that the API playground [renders correctly][api].

Fixes #1220 .

Information about the changes

  • Key functionality added:
    optional profile parameter force_turn_costs
    If true, algorithm selection defaults to FLEX_PREPROCESSED mode instead of FLEX_STATIC.

@takb takb force-pushed the patch-bkg-enforce-turn-cost branch from 5123288 to 5938659 Compare October 5, 2022 13:48
@takb takb requested review from sfendrich and aoles October 5, 2022 13:58
Copy link
Contributor

@sfendrich sfendrich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@aoles aoles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot @takb !

I encourage you to re-consider whether the new parameter force_turn_cost really belongs under encoder_options. I would argue that the parameters to encoder_options influence the base graph storage at build time, whereas forcing turn costs is a strictly run-time parameter. Therefore, my suggestion would be to move the parameter one level up to the general profile parameters. Does that make sense to you? Cheers!

@takb takb force-pushed the patch-bkg-enforce-turn-cost branch from e97fe1c to 648d9e8 Compare October 7, 2022 11:57
@takb
Copy link
Contributor Author

takb commented Oct 7, 2022

You're absolutely right @aoles , moved the parameter.

@takb takb requested a review from aoles October 7, 2022 12:08
Copy link
Member

@aoles aoles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @takb , please see my inline comments. Cheers!

@takb takb force-pushed the patch-bkg-enforce-turn-cost branch from 087ded7 to 4e1ec3c Compare October 10, 2022 10:02
@takb takb requested a review from aoles October 10, 2022 10:11
Copy link
Member

@aoles aoles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again @takb !

@takb takb merged commit 914932c into master Oct 10, 2022
@takb takb deleted the patch-bkg-enforce-turn-cost branch October 10, 2022 11:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Configuration option to force routing to select Turn Cost sensitive algo for routing
3 participants