-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preserve double border line when using trackLabel offset and use smaller gap between snpcoverage and reads #2678
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2678 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 60.21% 60.17% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 572 572
Lines 26611 26609 -2
Branches 6486 6484 -2
==========================================
- Hits 16024 16011 -13
- Misses 10262 10273 +11
Partials 325 325
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@garrettjstevens is this ok? any reason to prefer the Paper component? |
I prefer the look of using the Paper component. I think the top line gives a good visual cue of which track label mode you are using. If we do change it, though, I think the color should be |
I guess my preference would be for minimizing the lines in the interface. The border lines look less like a border and more like a weird double line in the overlapping mode and in the offset mode, it kind of looks like an empty track with no features with a labelless track below it |
good catch on the theme.palette.divider, i changed it to that |
any updates on this one? |
0e9ac43
to
4064242
Compare
Instead of using track borders at all now, the track border is removed, and instead, the resize handle between tracks is colored with theme.palette.divider (grey) I considered also making the resize handle between pileup and snpcov in the alignments track visible with grey but did not, i did make the distance smaller though |
I'm still seeing a border-bottom when testing this out. Also, I find the resize handle a lot harder to click with it being reduced to 2 pixels from 3. |
woops, I had an unpushed commit about the border. also debated the 2 vs 3 pixel height, pushed 3 here |
587c467
to
20ff611
Compare
20ff611
to
89aeb5c
Compare
I restored the border after looking at the comparison for a bit. The double border line creates a bit of a visual queue that is helpful, and it can be little hard to distinguish features e.g. introns from the 3px resize handle if it is solid This PR still contains some miscellaneous changes. Including
|
This removes the border below the track label when using track labels: offset (the default is overlapping). It is a subtle change but i think it makes the offset mode more clear
It changes to use a div instead of a paper
this PR
main
Also removes a double line near the scalebar in the overlapping(default) mode
this PR
main