Update report_id format

[tadhg-ohiggins]

Is the start the year?
No—the end defines the year.
Use fiscal year end.

---

Changes report_id to use fiscal year end date as per 2326. Generating report_id now follows these rules:

• Four-digit year based on submission fiscal end date.
• Two-digit month based on submission fiscal end date.
• Audit source: either GSA or CENSUS.
• Zero-padded 10-digit count.
• Separated by hyphens.
• No character limit.

For example:

• 2023-09-GSAFAC-0000000001
• 2020-09-CENSUS-0000000001

Also updates the test to handle this change.

If another PR lands in main before this one that alters the models in either audit or support, this branch will need to be updated approximately as follows:

1. Check this branch out locally.
2. Merge main into it.
3. If there are duplicate numbers in the migrations directories for audit or support, git rm the migrations files from this PR to get past this.
4. Run python manage.py makemigrations and python manage.py migrate locally.
5. Run the tests again.
6. Assuming the tests pass, git add the files in the audit and/or support migrations directories.
7. Push to this branch and wait for the GitHub tests to pass.

---

PR checklist: submitters

• Link to an issue if possible. If there’s no issue, describe what your branch does. Even if there is an issue, a brief description in the PR is still useful.
• List any special steps reviewers have to follow to test the PR. For example, adding a local environment variable, creating a local test file, etc.
• For extra credit, submit a screen recording like this one.
• Make sure you’ve merged main into your branch shortly before creating the PR. (You should also be merging main into your branch regularly during development.)
• Make sure that whatever feature you’re adding has tests that cover the feature. This includes test coverage to make sure that the previous workflow still works, if applicable.
• Do manual testing locally. Our tests are not good enough yet to allow us to skip this step. If that’s not applicable for some reason, check this box.
• Verify that no Git surgery was necessary, or, if it was necessary at any point, repeat the testing after it’s finished.
• Once a PR is merged, keep an eye on it until it’s deployed to dev, and do enough testing on dev to verify that it deployed successfully, the feature works as expected, and the happy path for the broad feature area (such as submission) still works.

PR checklist: reviewers

• Pull the branch to your local environment and run make docker-clean; make docker-first-run && docker compose up; then run docker compose exec web /bin/bash -c "python manage.py test"
• Manually test out the changes locally, or check this box to verify that it wasn’t applicable in this case.
• Check that the PR has appropriate tests. Look out for changes in HTML/JS/JSON Schema logic that may need to be captured in Python tests even though the logic isn’t in Python.
• Verify that no Git surgery is necessary at any point (such as during a merge party), or, if it was, repeat the testing after it’s finished.

The larger the PR, the stricter we should be about these points.

[github-actions]

Terraform plan for meta

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.s3-backups.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/s3-backups/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #253

[github-actions]

Terraform plan for dev

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.dev.module.database.cloudfoundry_service_instance.rds,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/dev.database/database/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "rds":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 2 more similar warnings elsewhere)

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #253

[github-actions]

File	Coverage		Missing
All files	89%	❌
api/serializers.py	90%	✅	125-126 131 136
api/test_views.py	96%	✅	105
api/uei.py	96%	✅	17-18 107-108
api/views.py	97%	✅	196-197 204-205 226 362-363
audit/excel.py	87%	❌	402 418 424 429 434 456-457 469 670-671 680-686 696 716
audit/forms.py	56%	❌	22-29
audit/intake_to_dissemination.py	92%	✅	67-68 197-203 253
audit/models.py	84%	❌	57 59 64 66 213 246 417 435-436 444 466 542-543 547 555 564 568 574 577-583
audit/test_commands.py	87%	❌
audit/test_mixins.py	90%	✅	112-113 117-119 184-185 189-191
audit/test_validators.py	95%	✅	436 440 608-609 848 855 862 869
audit/utils.py	76%	❌	13 21 38
audit/validators.py	96%	✅	298-299 314-315 525-534
audit/views.py	42%	❌	86-107 130-131 205-206 251-252 263-264 266-270 317-330 333-347 352-365 382-388 393-413 440-444 449-478 521-525 530-550 577-581 586-615 658-662 667-679 682-692 697-709 732-733 738-787 790-830 833-850
audit/cross_validation/additional_ueis.py	93%	✅	33
audit/cross_validation/check_award_ref_declaration.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_award_reference_uniqueness.py	93%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_certifying_contacts.py	87%	❌
audit/cross_validation/check_findings_count_consistency.py	91%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_cap.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_findings_text.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/errors.py	78%	❌	30 65
audit/cross_validation/naming.py	68%	❌	178-182
audit/cross_validation/submission_progress_check.py	85%	❌	64 79-82
audit/cross_validation/tribal_data_sharing_consent.py	86%	❌	20
audit/cross_validation/validate_general_information.py	93%	✅	28-29
audit/fixtures/single_audit_checklist.py	79%	❌	156 232-241
audit/management/commands/load_fixtures.py	46%	❌	39-45
audit/viewlib/submission_progress_view.py	96%	✅	158-159
audit/viewlib/upload_report_view.py	30%	❌	32-35 44 91-115 118-186
cms/views.py	57%	❌	11-16 29-30
config/urls.py	71%	❌	87
djangooidc/backends.py	78%	❌	32 57-63
djangooidc/exceptions.py	66%	❌	19 21 23 28
djangooidc/oidc.py	16%	❌	32-35 45-51 64-70 92-149 153-199 203-226 230-275 280-281 286
djangooidc/views.py	80%	❌	22 43 114
djangooidc/tests/common.py	96%	✅
report_submission/forms.py	92%	✅	35
report_submission/views.py	76%	❌	83 215-216 218 240-241 260-261 287-396 399-409
report_submission/templatetags/get_attr.py	76%	❌	8 11-14 18
support/admin.py	49%	❌	9-10 13 34 37 74 77 82 89-95 98-100 103-104 107-108
support/cog_over.py	90%	✅	30-33 86 93 145
support/signals.py	66%	❌	23-24 31-32
support/test_cog_over.py	98%	✅	134-135 224
support/management/commands/seed_cog_baseline.py	98%	✅	20-21
tools/update_program_data.py	89%	❌	96
users/auth.py	95%	✅	40-41
users/fixtures/user_fixtures.py	91%	✅

Minimum allowed coverage is 90%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 70e2b8d