-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update guidance for roles and responsible-party issue #57 #83
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I did not get to the review of this PR sooner. Can you address my one high-level concern, because I am not sure where this change would have come from.
d4f651f
to
a9c2488
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm approving because I don't think my feedback is significant enough to block, but I do want it to be considered.
a9c2488
to
8b9201a
Compare
@aj-stein-gsa I rebased to resolve conflicts with the data-center documentation PR. Other than that, all should be the same. |
This PR addresses issue #57 , clarifying requirements around which roles are required and what type of party ("person") must be associated. It also provides information on (prior) roles that are no longer required by FedRAMP.
NOTE: This PR adds a section that is referenced by the help-url of the "responsible-party-is-person" constraint, so this PR should be merged prior to PR GSA/fedramp-automation/pull/652 being merged