Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hello! 👋 It looks like this issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. This is usually because the request was already solved or it is no longer applicable. If this issue should remain open, remove the stale label or add a comment. Otherwise, this will be closed in 7 days. #7844

Closed
Casholey opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Casholey
Copy link

Casholey commented Aug 6, 2024

Hello! 👋 It looks like this issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. This is usually because the request was already solved or it is no longer applicable. If this issue should remain open, remove the stale label or add a comment. Otherwise, this will be closed in 7 days.

Originally posted by @github-actions in #7436 (comment)

Again as accessibility OMB forms are intended as fillable records. When individuals are unable to fill criteria due to only multiple choice Y/N prefilled data specific to sourcing only the objective of the collector. To prevent dispute agendas- claims of user problem are used to deny the access when in reality claim submission duty to make record, for example UI. Upon investigation denials are given based on uncompleted forms a device to create confusion, deferral, and forced manipulation to systemic support issues inclined to tax payers $ double abuse in nature of human support engines of machine operations.

@Casholey
Copy link
Author

Casholey commented Aug 6, 2024

Disclaimer: this issue describes personal issues r/t Forensic data evidence this is based on theory of collective evidence:

To resolve: possible ideas to create digital visual like formats could also be location adjustments GPS linked document ID:

I have to dumb this down for myself to describe as technical "code" I'm still trying to learn the objectives of these numbers and correlation of misclassifying documents as manipulation of possible systematic failures that is a snowball of issues that could be quick fix to resolve.

but maybe someone can understand what I'm trying to figure out.

I submit order for pizza delivery
Transaction completed with collection of data. Payment authorization created transaction ID receipt of exchange- you have an app that shows the order in progress with bar identifying estimated time ETA with visual tracking and GPS location for physical delivery. When order is completed the exchange is witnessed in proof of delivery both parties agree to arrangement if unsatisfied with result etc. platform is able to place bidding for missing or unidentified materials related to incidents fault creation ADR should be insurance resulted cost assurance

I.e.

  • transaction- receipt- tracking visual
  • claim #000000
  • status order pending- ETA
  • if a click to fill application is required, digital paper forms are outdated systems to digital recovery efforts and problematic to duplicate terms of efforts time cost value, delay in transaction, ease of denials- greater terms of data waste.

Digital documents can be edited based on location - ease to send to certain department addresses such that an OMB form to collect need assessments.

For example based on a current issue detected in banking transaction. The transaction billed as "RENT" shows on my bank statement as

"housing improvements"- this is deceptive to economic data

So my question is why are some of my rental transactions being collected in a category that looks like I'm spending excess funds on something like furniture.?

50%- rent
50%- housing improvements

Increasing cost burden to individuals if the economic system shows rent costs are 50% total spent and 50% housing improvements

Revenue is not reported as burden of fault - individual Cost of living resulting in public misuse of funds on home furnishing.

So if state is collective on banking data- reports are largely disproportionate in reports snowball effects of this show consumer spending outside means is results and faults of individuals when chain link is the transaction ID sending this data to erroneous measures.

Who does this benefit? Who bears the burden.

This data is established by transfers-

So if individual is making a purchase how do you know that purchase -ACH transfer identity is actually for pizza or your buying lingerie for the office secretary?

Maybe that "Label" -pizza is actually routing to miscellaneous unidentified production category.

... pizzagate

So if your checking account remains the same who is an easy target for money to be easily access and removed? - individuals with lack of transparency.

Financial auditing is something that we all would like more control over how "hidden fee transfers label indicators are being manipulated in policy" you hear policy rule making to end "fees"- but it's just as easy for them to say that and make you believe this problem is being addressed- yet on the backend the scheme is just a way for them to be smarter and more creative in power of control. Easy fix for them they have the keys to rename and keep us further behind the blinders.

If policy is an
'Ad for market share' this is not only deceptive, but extremism has created ways to lock up your assets, create poverty, create and blame the disabled people it injures to keep their mouths shut and fails to address the real problem of equity.

If funds are allocated for distribution- the windfall game is easily hidden to scape goat a never ending ripple from the top ending in the most endangered species who are the weakest the bottom. The pipeline is inflation pumping the "water" who's actually drinking the water?

You ask the system what are my water rights?

Answer: your building you do not have water rights.

Same goes for Network:

They own your domain:
they access your domain
they manipulate your domain

If you ask for collection for proof you'll find it's difficult for them to find these because the mess they made in

-misclassifying transfer codes-

Is this an easy polygraph for them to say "sorry your loss"-legal protection

We don't know where your information is or we only have this information and you failed to provide us this in order for it to be complete- and they game will go on until your drained of all your blood.

But when you lose "they will make you pay"

Id just like some answers to be able to determine what I can see as a problem to fix if these are truly something "nobody has noticed" then let's fix the problem.

This is why I'd like to get some understanding and access..

Thanks for your understanding and comments for clarity.

As well as maybe direction of assistance to workspace for project as maybe what I've collected is misunderstanding I truly believe I have evidence showing otherwise.

Greatly appreciated

@CheekSpreada
Copy link

right on

@RileySeaburg
Copy link
Member

Closing as spam

@RileySeaburg RileySeaburg closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 28, 2024
@CheekSpreada
Copy link

CheekSpreada commented Aug 30, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants