-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 305
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello! 👋 It looks like this issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. This is usually because the request was already solved or it is no longer applicable. If this issue should remain open, remove the stale label or add a comment. Otherwise, this will be closed in 7 days. #7844
Comments
Disclaimer: this issue describes personal issues r/t Forensic data evidence this is based on theory of collective evidence: To resolve: possible ideas to create digital visual like formats could also be location adjustments GPS linked document ID: I have to dumb this down for myself to describe as technical "code" I'm still trying to learn the objectives of these numbers and correlation of misclassifying documents as manipulation of possible systematic failures that is a snowball of issues that could be quick fix to resolve. but maybe someone can understand what I'm trying to figure out. I submit order for pizza delivery I.e.
Digital documents can be edited based on location - ease to send to certain department addresses such that an OMB form to collect need assessments. For example based on a current issue detected in banking transaction. The transaction billed as "RENT" shows on my bank statement as "housing improvements"- this is deceptive to economic data So my question is why are some of my rental transactions being collected in a category that looks like I'm spending excess funds on something like furniture.? 50%- rent Increasing cost burden to individuals if the economic system shows rent costs are 50% total spent and 50% housing improvements Revenue is not reported as burden of fault - individual Cost of living resulting in public misuse of funds on home furnishing. So if state is collective on banking data- reports are largely disproportionate in reports snowball effects of this show consumer spending outside means is results and faults of individuals when chain link is the transaction ID sending this data to erroneous measures. Who does this benefit? Who bears the burden. This data is established by transfers- So if individual is making a purchase how do you know that purchase -ACH transfer identity is actually for pizza or your buying lingerie for the office secretary? Maybe that "Label" -pizza is actually routing to miscellaneous unidentified production category. ... pizzagate So if your checking account remains the same who is an easy target for money to be easily access and removed? - individuals with lack of transparency. Financial auditing is something that we all would like more control over how "hidden fee transfers label indicators are being manipulated in policy" you hear policy rule making to end "fees"- but it's just as easy for them to say that and make you believe this problem is being addressed- yet on the backend the scheme is just a way for them to be smarter and more creative in power of control. Easy fix for them they have the keys to rename and keep us further behind the blinders. If policy is an If funds are allocated for distribution- the windfall game is easily hidden to scape goat a never ending ripple from the top ending in the most endangered species who are the weakest the bottom. The pipeline is inflation pumping the "water" who's actually drinking the water? You ask the system what are my water rights? Answer: your building you do not have water rights. Same goes for Network: They own your domain: If you ask for collection for proof you'll find it's difficult for them to find these because the mess they made in -misclassifying transfer codes- Is this an easy polygraph for them to say "sorry your loss"-legal protection We don't know where your information is or we only have this information and you failed to provide us this in order for it to be complete- and they game will go on until your drained of all your blood. But when you lose "they will make you pay" Id just like some answers to be able to determine what I can see as a problem to fix if these are truly something "nobody has noticed" then let's fix the problem. This is why I'd like to get some understanding and access.. Thanks for your understanding and comments for clarity. As well as maybe direction of assistance to workspace for project as maybe what I've collected is misunderstanding I truly believe I have evidence showing otherwise. Greatly appreciated |
right on |
Closing as spam |
Thanks for your help
…On Wed, Aug 28, 2024, 3:15 PM Riley Seaburg ***@***.***> wrote:
Closing as spam
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7844 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BKRGLNKOVKV32QJWMXTXWZ3ZTYOWVAVCNFSM6AAAAABMCX7CV2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJWGA3TSMZRGA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: <GSA/digitalgov.
***@***.***>
|
Hello! 👋 It looks like this issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. This is usually because the request was already solved or it is no longer applicable. If this issue should remain open, remove the stale label or add a comment. Otherwise, this will be closed in 7 days.
Originally posted by @github-actions in #7436 (comment)
Again as accessibility OMB forms are intended as fillable records. When individuals are unable to fill criteria due to only multiple choice Y/N prefilled data specific to sourcing only the objective of the collector. To prevent dispute agendas- claims of user problem are used to deny the access when in reality claim submission duty to make record, for example UI. Upon investigation denials are given based on uncompleted forms a device to create confusion, deferral, and forced manipulation to systemic support issues inclined to tax payers $ double abuse in nature of human support engines of machine operations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: