Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Actions: tighten when docker build runs and how #682

Merged

Conversation

aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa commented Sep 11, 2024

Committer Notes

  • We do not want to fails build when staff and community make fork PRs.
  • We want to make sure the latest feature branch is tagged and deployed for now, stop push PR container builds before merge.
  • Improve metadata on GHCR versions page (maybe? still unclear why it doesn't show)

All Submissions:

By submitting a pull request, you are agreeing to provide this contribution under the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.

- We do not want to fails build when staff and community make fork PRs.
- We want to make sure the latest feature branch is tagged and deployed
for now, stop push PR container builds before merge.
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa self-assigned this Sep 11, 2024
I am not sure that syntax is air-tight with var == 'value1' || 'value2',
so make it more explicit and have var on left side and right side of the
boolean OR check.
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 14:54
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2024 14:54
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa merged commit a1b0f27 into feature/external-constraints Sep 11, 2024
3 checks passed
aj-stein-gsa added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
* Actions: tighten when docker build runs and how

- We do not want to fails build when staff and community make fork PRs.
- We want to make sure the latest feature branch is tagged and deployed
for now, stop push PR container builds before merge.

* Actions: more explicit branch targeting

I am not sure that syntax is air-tight with var == 'value1' || 'value2',
so make it more explicit and have var on left side and right side of the
boolean OR check.

* Actions: even more explicit use startsWith syntax

* Actions: one last attempt to force annotations
aj-stein-gsa added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
* Actions: tighten when docker build runs and how

- We do not want to fails build when staff and community make fork PRs.
- We want to make sure the latest feature branch is tagged and deployed
for now, stop push PR container builds before merge.

* Actions: more explicit branch targeting

I am not sure that syntax is air-tight with var == 'value1' || 'value2',
so make it more explicit and have var on left side and right side of the
boolean OR check.

* Actions: even more explicit use startsWith syntax

* Actions: one last attempt to force annotations
Rene2mt pushed a commit to Rene2mt/fedramp-automation that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
* Actions: tighten when docker build runs and how

- We do not want to fails build when staff and community make fork PRs.
- We want to make sure the latest feature branch is tagged and deployed
for now, stop push PR container builds before merge.

* Actions: more explicit branch targeting

I am not sure that syntax is air-tight with var == 'value1' || 'value2',
so make it more explicit and have var on left side and right side of the
boolean OR check.

* Actions: even more explicit use startsWith syntax

* Actions: one last attempt to force annotations
brian-ruf pushed a commit to brian-ruf/fedramp-automation that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
* Actions: tighten when docker build runs and how

- We do not want to fails build when staff and community make fork PRs.
- We want to make sure the latest feature branch is tagged and deployed
for now, stop push PR container builds before merge.

* Actions: more explicit branch targeting

I am not sure that syntax is air-tight with var == 'value1' || 'value2',
so make it more explicit and have var on left side and right side of the
boolean OR check.

* Actions: even more explicit use startsWith syntax

* Actions: one last attempt to force annotations
This was referenced Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant