-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add has-marking #875
Add has-marking #875
Conversation
Issue #836. |
@DimitriZhurkin why did you close this PR? |
Because its workflows didn't appear on the I tried recreating it locally, and all hell broke loose. Now my local repository is screwed up completely. I reopened this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good to me, just rebase before merging
I did rebase my local repo. I also did hard reset, just in case. |
Paul, How do I remove the erroneously generated I tried removing When I pull, I'm getting the following message: |
Still the same workflow run error:
|
77952e6
to
88112ff
Compare
Co-authored-by: A.J. Stein <aj@gsa.gov>
88112ff
to
ff07939
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a minor wording nit, but I am happy this. I would
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR looks good, but waiting for suggestions to be merged and the documentation PR to be updated, then I'll approve
Oh and @DimitriZhurkin when you find this PR I clean up things because I misled led you. Locally on your computer if you want to make changes and not just in GitHub before moving onto the website PR requested in #875 (comment):
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me. Nice work!
Documentation created (GSA/automate.fedramp.gov#110). |
Wording changes implemented. |
Committer Notes
has-marking
constraint to check the existence of the<prop name="marking" value="cui"/>
metadata prop.marking
metadata prop.marking
metadata prop tossp-all-VALID.xml
file.All Submissions:
By submitting a pull request, you are agreeing to provide this contribution under the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.