Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move cryptol-remote-api to the Cryptol repo #92

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 12, 2020

Conversation

atomb
Copy link

@atomb atomb commented Oct 7, 2020

In conjunction with a related PR, this moves the cryptol-remote-api package from the argo repo to the cryptol repo.

Aaron Tomb added 2 commits October 7, 2020 11:18
Copy link
Contributor

@david-christiansen david-christiansen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The deletions all make sense.

The changes to the test code for CI are good to have, but it feels a bit like they're in the "hack until it works" category rather than the "clean thing that works" category. I think that at least an explanatory comment or three could help us make sure we keep them working in the future.

tasty-script-exitcode/src/Test/Tasty/HUnit/ScriptExit.hs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tasty-hunit ^>= 0.10,
tasty ^>= 1.2,
temporary ^>= 1.3
build-depends: base >=4.12,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The purpose of the ^>= is to add a PVP-based upper bound. This change asserts that we'll work with all the future versions of these packages - is that what we want to be saying?

Copy link
Author

@atomb atomb Oct 12, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure that I agree that that's what it means. In my opinion it means that we don't know that we don't work with future versions and don't want to rule them out until we do know that they'll cause problems.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was going off the descriptions here: https://cabal.readthedocs.io/en/3.4/cabal-package.html#build-information

But the Platonic form of meaning of the operators and their realization in practice is certainly different, and in practice, we'll have bounds imposed by Cryptol itself anyway.

@atomb atomb merged commit 023a3c4 into master Oct 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants