-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explicit stride #1227
Explicit stride #1227
Conversation
This doesn't yet pipe the new constructs through the typechecker.
Hook them up through the typechecker. However, we still need implementations.
We define `inf /^ n = inf` and `inf %^ n` for finite, positive `n`.
Documentation updates are still needed, but I wanted to make sure we are happy with the syntax choices before doing that. |
Minor output changes in the exercises are required.
@robdockins the notation makes sense to me. The only improvement I can think of is to clarify in the comment-docs for the "inclusive" constructs (the non |
We need to avoid the new `down` keyword.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there are a few more changes that we need for the solver, to match the more relaxed constraints on /^
and /%
.
Otherwise it looks good to me, with the caveat that I didn't go over the evaluation semantics in detail
AFAICT, the remaining failures are not related to this PR. |
@yav, @brianhuffman, any additional thoughts about this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
Add stub implementations of the new enumeration primitives from GaloisInc/cryptol#1227, and fix up the type of `ecFromTo`, which also changed slightly in that PR.
Add stub implementations of the new enumeration primitives from GaloisInc/cryptol#1227, and fix up the type of `ecFromTo`, which also changed slightly in that PR.
Add stub implementations of the new enumeration primitives from GaloisInc/cryptol#1227, and fix up the type of `ecFromTo`, which also changed slightly in that PR.
This PR adds new syntactic forms for enumerations with explicit stride values (CF #1087).
The currently-implemented syntax steals the identifiers
by
anddown
as new keywords; we should discuss if this is acceptable, or if new syntax should be designed.